OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia, to evaluate de-escalation in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia treated according to local pathway, and to identify the bacteria responsible for recurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective observational study during a 36-month period. SETTING: Medical-surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred and fifteen patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit developing ventilator-associated pneumonia with positive cultures. The patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia were treated with limited-spectrum antibiotics (i.e., without activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa) if they had no prior hospitalization (within 21 days) or prior administration of antibiotics (within 10 days). Quantitative cultures obtained by bronchoscopy or tracheal aspiration were used to reassess empirical therapy. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A limited-spectrum therapy was used in 79 patients (69%). Empirical antimicrobial therapy was appropriate in 100 patients (85%). The mortality rate was significantly higher in the patients in whom empirical therapy was inappropriate than in those in whom treatment was appropriate (47 vs. 20%, p=.04). De-escalation was done in respectively 26% and 72% of patients with early- and late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia, whereas treatment was escalated in 27 patients (23%). Ventilator-associated pneumonia episodes were recurrent in 22 cases, including eight episodes due to high-risk bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: A rational empirical antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia using limited-spectrum antibiotics is possible if local ecology and patient medical history and clinical status are considered. In addition, de-escalation is feasible in 42% of patients. This integrative approach may reduce the emergence of resistant bacteria, which in turns reduces the need for broad-spectrum antibiotics, breaking the vicious circle of antibiotic overuse.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of appropriateness of empirical antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia, to evaluate de-escalation in patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia treated according to local pathway, and to identify the bacteria responsible for recurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective observational study during a 36-month period. SETTING: Medical-surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred and fifteen patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit developing ventilator-associated pneumonia with positive cultures. The patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia were treated with limited-spectrum antibiotics (i.e., without activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa) if they had no prior hospitalization (within 21 days) or prior administration of antibiotics (within 10 days). Quantitative cultures obtained by bronchoscopy or tracheal aspiration were used to reassess empirical therapy. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A limited-spectrum therapy was used in 79 patients (69%). Empirical antimicrobial therapy was appropriate in 100 patients (85%). The mortality rate was significantly higher in the patients in whom empirical therapy was inappropriate than in those in whom treatment was appropriate (47 vs. 20%, p=.04). De-escalation was done in respectively 26% and 72% of patients with early- and late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia, whereas treatment was escalated in 27 patients (23%). Ventilator-associated pneumonia episodes were recurrent in 22 cases, including eight episodes due to high-risk bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: A rational empirical antimicrobial therapy for ventilator-associated pneumonia using limited-spectrum antibiotics is possible if local ecology and patient medical history and clinical status are considered. In addition, de-escalation is feasible in 42% of patients. This integrative approach may reduce the emergence of resistant bacteria, which in turns reduces the need for broad-spectrum antibiotics, breaking the vicious circle of antibiotic overuse.
Authors: N Joram; L de Saint Blanquat; D Stamm; E Launay; C Gras-Le Guen Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Frédéric Garcin; Marc Leone; François Antonini; Aude Charvet; Jacques Albanèse; Claude Martin Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Ana Motos; Gianluigi Li Bassi; Francesco Pagliara; Laia Fernandez-Barat; Hua Yang; Eli Aguilera Xiol; Tarek Senussi; Francesco A Idone; Chiara Travierso; Chiara Chiurazzi; Rosanel Amaro; Minlan Yang; Joaquim Bobi; Montserrat Rigol; David P Nicolau; Gerard Frigola; Roberto Cabrera; Jose Ramirez; Paolo Pelosi; Francesco Blasi; Massimo Antonelli; Antonio Artigas; Jordi Vila; Marin Kollef; Antoni Torres Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2021-01-20 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Jeffrey A Claridge; Priscilla Pang; William H Leukhardt; Joseph F Golob; Jeffrey W Carter; Adam M Fadlalla Journal: Surg Infect (Larchmt) Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.150
Authors: Alexis Tabah; Matteo Bassetti; Marin H Kollef; Jean-Ralph Zahar; José-Artur Paiva; Jean-Francois Timsit; Jason A Roberts; Jeroen Schouten; Helen Giamarellou; Jordi Rello; Jan De Waele; Andrew F Shorr; Marc Leone; Garyphallia Poulakou; Pieter Depuydt; Jose Garnacho-Montero Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-11-28 Impact factor: 17.440