Literature DB >> 17205002

Can physiological variables and early warning scoring systems allow early recognition of the deteriorating surgical patient?

Brian H Cuthbertson1, Massoud Boroujerdi, Laurin McKie, Lorna Aucott, Gordon Prescott.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Early warning scoring systems are widely used in clinical practice to allow early recognition of the deteriorating patient, but they lack validation. We aimed to test the ability of physiologic variables, either alone or in existing early scoring systems, to predict major deterioration in a patient's condition and attempt to derive functions with superior accuracy.
DESIGN: A comparative cohort study.
SETTING: A teaching hospital in Scotland. PATIENTS: Two cohorts of general surgical high-dependency patients. The cohorts are a group of surgical high-dependency care patients who did not require intensive care admission and another group of patients who did require admission.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Prospective physiologic data on consecutive surgical high-dependency unit patients were collected and compared with physiologic data on patients admitted to the intensive care unit from the same surgical high-dependency units. Data were quality checked and summarized, and discriminant analysis and receiver operator curves were used to discriminate between the groups. There were significant physiologic differences between groups with regard to heart rate (p<.001, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.7), respiratory rate (p<.001, AUC 0.71), and oxygen saturation (p<.001, AUC 0.78) across time points. This was not present for systolic blood pressure or temperature. Existing early warning scoring systems had good discriminatory power (AUC 0.83-0.86). We derived discriminant functions, which have a high predictive ability to determine differences between groups (p<.0001, AUC 0.86-0.90). We found that heart rate and respiratory rate could detect differences between groups at 6 and 8 hrs before ICU admission, but oxygen saturation and the discriminant function 2 could detect differences 48 hrs before ICU admission.
CONCLUSIONS: Some commonly used physiologic variables have reasonable power in determining the difference between patients requiring intensive care unit admission, but others are poor. Existing early warning scores have comparatively good discriminatory power. We have derived functions with excellent predictive power in this derivation cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17205002     DOI: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000254826.10520.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  39 in total

1.  Predicting cardiac arrest on the wards: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Matthew M Churpek; Trevor C Yuen; Michael T Huber; Seo Young Park; Jesse B Hall; Dana P Edelson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  An easy and accurate respiratory rate monitor is necessary.

Authors:  Nicolas Marjanovic; Olivier Mimoz; Jérémy Guenezan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Moving Beyond Single-Parameter Early Warning Scores for Rapid Response System Activation.

Authors:  Matthew M Churpek; Dana P Edelson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 4.  Development and validation of early warning score system: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Li-Heng Fu; Jessica Schwartz; Amanda Moy; Chris Knaplund; Min-Jeoung Kang; Kumiko O Schnock; Jose P Garcia; Haomiao Jia; Patricia C Dykes; Kenrick Cato; David Albers; Sarah Collins Rossetti
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  Predicting clinical deterioration in the hospital: the impact of outcome selection.

Authors:  Matthew M Churpek; Trevor C Yuen; Dana P Edelson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Validating the Electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) Score for Risk Stratification of Surgical Inpatients in the Postoperative Setting: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Bartkowiak; Ashley M Snyder; Andrew Benjamin; Andrew Schneider; Nicole M Twu; Matthew M Churpek; Kevin K Roggin; Dana P Edelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Obstetric anaesthesia: Widening horizons?

Authors:  Sunanda Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-09

8.  Evaluation of Early Warning Scoring System and Nursing Guide Application in Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit.

Authors:  Berrin Pazar; Ayla Yava
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2013-05-23

9.  Multicenter development and validation of a risk stratification tool for ward patients.

Authors:  Matthew M Churpek; Trevor C Yuen; Christopher Winslow; Ari A Robicsek; David O Meltzer; Robert D Gibbons; Dana P Edelson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 10.  A review of risk scoring systems utilised in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Aninda Chandra; Sudhakar Mangam; Deya Marzouk
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.