Literature DB >> 17204991

Electromyographic findings after different selective neck dissections.

Tetsuya Tsuji1, Akira Tanuma, Tetsuro Onitsuka, Mitsuru Ebihara, Yoshiyuki Iida, Akio Kimura, Meigen Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to compare electrophysiologic investigations of the upper trapezius muscle (UT) after different selective neck dissections (SND) and analyze the differences between types of SND and the preservation and excision of the cervical nerves (the C2-4 rami of the cervical plexus). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study of 54 patients (average age, 65.1 +/- 9.6 yr, 45 males) with 70 SND.
METHODS: Patients underwent needle electromyography (EMG) of the UT by 4 months after surgery. The findings were rated according to the 5 point EMG scale system from 1 (total denervation: positive sharp wave or fibrillation potential at rest and electrical silence at voluntary contraction) to 5 (normal pattern).
RESULTS: The average EMG scale was 1.7 +/- 1.1, 58.6% for score 1 and only 5.7% for score 5. There was not a significant difference in the EMG scale between the types of SND, whereas the group in which the cervical nerves were excised was significantly lower than in that in which it was preserved. The average EMG scales in the former and latter were 1.5 +/- 0.8 and 2.0 +/- 1.3, 68.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: The study data confirm that complete or incomplete denervation of the UT was caused by axonal injury of the spinal accessory nerve, even though it was spared, because of traction of the nerve during neck dissection. Second, the excision of the C2 to 4 rami of the cervical plexus caused worse damage of the UT. It is suggested that it is important to preserve the cervical nerves to avoid denervation of the UT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17204991     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000249781.20989.5c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  The impact on post-operative shoulder function of intraoperative nerve monitoring of cranial nerve XI during modified radical neck dissection.

Authors:  Boštjan Lanišnik; Lidija Žitnik; Primož Levart; Miha Žargi; Zoran Rodi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Nerve and vein preserving neck dissections for oral cancers: a prospective evaluation of spinal accessory nerve function and internal jugular vein patency following treatment.

Authors:  G R Kumar Reddy; N Hulikal; A Y Lakshmi; B Vengamma
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  A randomized controlled trial of scapular exercises with electromyography biofeedback in oral cancer patients with accessory nerve dysfunction.

Authors:  Yueh-Hsia Chen; Wei-An Liang; Chi-Rung Lin; Cheng-Ya Huang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 3.359

4.  Minimizing shoulder syndrome with intra-operative spinal accessory nerve monitoring for neck dissection.

Authors:  C-H Lee; N-C Huang; H-C Chen; M-K Chen
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Identification of three anatomical patterns of the spinal accessory nerve in the neck by neurophysiological mapping.

Authors:  Bostjan Lanisnik; Miha Zargi; Zoran Rodi
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Spinal accessory nerve neuropathy following neck dissection.

Authors:  Luciana Pereira de Lima; Ali Amar; Carlos Neutzling Lehn
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.