BACKGROUND: Risks and mechanisms of head, face, and eye injuries in high school and college lacrosse are not well documented. PURPOSE: To identify (1) primary mechanisms of head, face, and eye injuries in lacrosse and (2) differences in injury risk between the men's and women's game and between high school and collegiate levels. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study. METHODS: The authors gathered data on 507,000 girls' and boys' high school and 649,573 women's and men's college lacrosse athletic exposures using sport-specific injury surveillance systems over 4 seasons. They identified the most common scenarios for head, face, and eye injuries. RESULTS: The high school girls' head, face, and eye injury rate (0.54 per 1000 athletic exposures) was significantly higher (incident rate ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.86) than that for boys (0.38 per 1000 athletic exposures); college women (0.77 per 1000 athletic exposures) sustained a higher rate of injuries (incident rate ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.19) than did men (0.44 per 1000 athletic exposures). Concussions constituted a higher percentage of injuries among boys (73%) and men (85%) than among girls (40%) and women (41%). Men sustained few facial injuries, whereas a substantial proportion of women's injuries involved the face and orbital area. CONCLUSION: Although permitting only incidental contact, women's lacrosse had higher rates of head, face, and eye injuries at both the high school and collegiate levels. Concussion was the most common injury. For men, the primary injury mechanism was player-to-player contact; women's injuries primarily resulted from stick or ball contact. High school injury rates were lower than were college rates, but the nature of injuries, body parts affected, and mechanisms were similar.
BACKGROUND: Risks and mechanisms of head, face, and eye injuries in high school and college lacrosse are not well documented. PURPOSE: To identify (1) primary mechanisms of head, face, and eye injuries in lacrosse and (2) differences in injury risk between the men's and women's game and between high school and collegiate levels. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiological study. METHODS: The authors gathered data on 507,000 girls' and boys' high school and 649,573 women's and men's college lacrosse athletic exposures using sport-specific injury surveillance systems over 4 seasons. They identified the most common scenarios for head, face, and eye injuries. RESULTS: The high school girls' head, face, and eye injury rate (0.54 per 1000 athletic exposures) was significantly higher (incident rate ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.86) than that for boys (0.38 per 1000 athletic exposures); college women (0.77 per 1000 athletic exposures) sustained a higher rate of injuries (incident rate ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.19) than did men (0.44 per 1000 athletic exposures). Concussions constituted a higher percentage of injuries among boys (73%) and men (85%) than among girls (40%) and women (41%). Men sustained few facial injuries, whereas a substantial proportion of women's injuries involved the face and orbital area. CONCLUSION: Although permitting only incidental contact, women's lacrosse had higher rates of head, face, and eye injuries at both the high school and collegiate levels. Concussion was the most common injury. For men, the primary injury mechanism was player-to-player contact; women's injuries primarily resulted from stick or ball contact. High school injury rates were lower than were college rates, but the nature of injuries, body parts affected, and mechanisms were similar.
Authors: Daniel H Daneshvar; Christine M Baugh; Christopher J Nowinski; Ann C McKee; Robert A Stern; Robert C Cantu Journal: Clin Sports Med Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.182
Authors: Lauren A Pierpoint; Andrew E Lincoln; Nina Walker; Shane V Caswell; Dustin W Currie; Sarah B Knowles; Erin B Wasserman; Thomas P Dompier; R Dawn Comstock; Stephen W Marshall; Zachary Y Kerr Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Lauren A Pierpoint; Shane V Caswell; Nina Walker; Andrew E Lincoln; Dustin W Currie; Sarah B Knowles; Erin B Wasserman; Thomas P Dompier; R Dawn Comstock; Stephen W Marshall; Zachary Y Kerr Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-01 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Randall Dick; Andrew E Lincoln; Julie Agel; Elizabeth A Carter; Stephen W Marshall; Richard Y Hinton Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2007 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Keegan Warner; Jennifer Savage; Christopher M Kuenze; Alexandria Erkenbeck; R Dawn Comstock; Tracey Covassin Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Viviana Bompadre; Thomas M Jinguji; N David Yanez; Emma K Satchell; Kaiulani Gilbert; Monique Burton; Ernest U Conrad; Stanley A Herring Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2014-05-28 Impact factor: 2.860