Literature DB >> 17203535

Colonic exclusion and combined therapy for refractory constipation.

Hong-Yun Peng1, Ai-Zhong Xu.   

Abstract

AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effectiveness of colonic exclusion and combined therapy for refractory constipation.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with refractory constipation were randomly divided into treatment group (n = 14) and control group (n = 18). Fourteen patients in treatment group underwent colonic exclusion and end-to-side colorectal anastomosis. Eighteen patients in control group received subtotal colectomy and end-to-end colorectal anastomosis. The therapeutic effects of the operations were assessed by comparing the surgical time, incision length, volume of blood losses, hospital stay, recovery rate and complication incidence. All patients received long-term follow-up.
RESULTS: All operations were successful and patients recovered fully after the operations. In comparison of treatment group and control group, the surgical time (h), incision length (cm), volume of blood losses (mL), hospital stay (d) were 87 +/- 16 min vs 194 +/- 23 min (t = 9.85), 10.4 +/- 0.5 cm vs 21.2 +/- 1.8 cm (t = 14.26), 79.5 +/- 31.3 mL vs 286.3 +/- 49.2 mL (t = 17.24), and 11.8 +/- 2.4 d vs 18.6 +/- 2.6 d (t = 6.91), respectively (P < 0.001 for all). The recovery rate and complication incidence were 85.7% vs 88.9% (P = 0.14 > 0.05), 21.4% vs 33.3% (P = 0.73 > 0.05), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Colonic exclusion has better therapeutic efficacy on refractory constipation. It has many advantages such as shorter surgical time, smaller incision, fewer blood losses and shorter hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17203535      PMCID: PMC4087557          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i48.7864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  7 in total

1.  Quality of life after subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation: both quality and quantity count.

Authors:  Gregory P FitzHarris; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Susan C Parker; Kelli M Bullard; Robert D Madoff; Stanley M Goldberg; Ann Lowry
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 2.  Slow transit constipation: a model of human gut dysmotility. Review of possible aetiologies.

Authors:  C H Knowles; J E Martin
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 3.  Surgery for constipation: a review.

Authors:  J Pfeifer; F Agachan; S D Wexner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  A long-term follow-up of patients undergoing colectomy for chronic idiopathic constipation.

Authors:  C Platell; D Scache; G Mumme; R Stitz
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  1996-08

5.  Outcome of segmental colonic resection for slow-transit constipation.

Authors:  E Lundin; U Karlbom; L Påhlman; W Graf
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Abnormal colonic propagated activity in patients with slow transit constipation and constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Gabrio Bassotti; Fabio Chistolini; Gabriele Marinozzi; Antonio Morelli
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 7.  Evaluation of constipation.

Authors:  Daisy A Arce; Carlos A Ermocilla; Hildegardo Costa
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 3.292

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Retrospective series of subtotal colonic bypass and antiperistaltic cecoproctostomy for the treatment of slow-transit constipation.

Authors:  Yonggang Wang; Chunbao Zhai; Liyun Niu; Lijun Tian; Jianyong Yang; Zheng Hu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.