Literature DB >> 17202394

Effects of intermittent suckling and creep feed intake on pig performance from birth to slaughter.

W I Kuller1, N M Soede, H M G van Beers-Schreurs, P Langendijk, M A M Taverne, B Kemp, J H M Verheijden.   

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine if the improved creep feed intake observed during intermittent suckling (IS) is important for postweaning performance. Therefore, creep feed intake of litters was assessed, and within litters, eaters and noneaters were distinguished using chromic oxide as an indigestible marker. Batches of sows were suckled intermittently (IS, 7 batches; n = 31) or continuously (control, 7 batches; n = 31). In the IS group, litters were separated from the sow for a period of 12 h/d (0930 to 2130), beginning 11 d before weaning. Litters were weaned at 4 wk of age. Litters had free access to creep feed from 1 wk of age onward. Five days after weaning, the piglets were moved as a litter to weanling pens. At 8 wk of age, 2 barrows and 2 gilts were randomly chosen from each litter and moved to a finishing facility. Feed intake was improved by IS during the last 11 d of lactation (IS, 284 +/- 27 vs. control, 83 +/- 28 g/piglet; P < 0.001) and after weaning during the first (IS, 201 +/- 24 vs. control, 157 +/- 25 g x piglet(-1) x d(-1); P < 0.05) and second (IS, 667 +/- 33 vs. control, 570 +/- 35 g x piglet(-1) x d(-1); P < 0.05) wk. Thereafter, no differences were found to slaughter. Weaning BW was lower in IS litters (IS, 7.1 +/- 0.01 vs. control, 8.1 +/- 0.01 kg/piglet; P < 0.05), but 7 d after weaning BW was similar (IS, 8.5 +/- 0.2 vs. control, 8.7 +/- 0.2 kg/piglet; P = 0.18), and no differences were found to slaughter. The percentage of eaters within a litter was not increased by IS during lactation (IS, 23 +/- 4.5% vs. control, 19 +/- 4.1%; P = 0.15). Weaning BW did not differ between eaters and noneaters (eater, 7.7 +/- 0.1 vs. noneater, 7.5 +/- 0.08 kg/piglet; P = 0.63). From 1 until 4 wk after weaning, piglets that were eaters during lactation had heavier BW than noneaters (eater, 20.3 +/- 0.3 kg vs. noneater, 18.2 +/- 0.2 kg; P < 0.05). The influence of eating creep feed during lactation on BW and ADG and the influence of suckling treatment never showed an interaction. We conclude that IS increases ADFI during lactation on a litter level and improves ADG in the first week and ADFI in the first and second weeks after weaning. No long-term effects on ADFI or ADG were observed throughout the finishing period. In the current experiment, in which creep feed intake was low, the percentage of eaters within a litter was not increased, suggesting that creep feed intake of piglets that were already eating was stimulated by IS. Further, piglets that were eaters during lactation had heavier BW up to 4 wk after weaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17202394     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2006-177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  What is good for small piglets might not be good for big piglets: The consequences of cross-fostering and creep feed provision on performance to slaughter.

Authors:  A M S Huting; K Almond; I Wellock; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The effect of creep feed intake and starter diet allowance on piglets' gut structure and growth performance after weaning.

Authors:  Ramon Muns; Elizabeth Magowan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Intermittent Suckling in Combination with an Older Weaning Age Improves Growth, Feed Intake and Aspects of Gastrointestinal Tract Carbohydrate Absorption in Pigs after Weaning.

Authors:  Diana L Turpin; Pieter Langendijk; Tai-Yuan Chen; John R Pluske
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Intermittent suckling with or without co-mingling of non-littermate piglets before weaning improves piglet performance in the immediate post-weaning period when compared with conventional weaning.

Authors:  Diana L Turpin; Pieter Langendijk; Kate Plush; John R Pluske
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-28

5.  Pigs Like It Varied; Feeding Behavior and Pre- and Post-weaning Performance of Piglets Exposed to Dietary Diversity and Feed Hidden in Substrate During Lactation.

Authors:  Anouschka Middelkoop; Manon A van Marwijk; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-11-19

6.  Feed intake of the sow and playful creep feeding of piglets influence piglet behaviour and performance before and after weaning.

Authors:  Anouschka Middelkoop; Natasja Costermans; Bas Kemp; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Impact of early-life feeding on local intestinal microbiota and digestive system development in piglets.

Authors:  R Choudhury; A Middelkoop; J G de Souza; L A van Veen; W J J Gerrits; B Kemp; J E Bolhuis; M Kleerebezem
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Intermittent Suckling Causes a Transient Increase in Cortisol That Does Not Appear to Compromise Selected Measures of Piglet Welfare and Stress.

Authors:  Diana L Turpin; Pieter Langendijk; Tai-Yuan Chen; David Lines; John R Pluske
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 9.  Husbandry practices and gut health outcomes in weaned piglets: A review.

Authors:  Balachandar Jayaraman; Charles M Nyachoti
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2017-06-29

Review 10.  Gastrointestinal tract (gut) health in the young pig.

Authors:  John R Pluske; Diana L Turpin; Jae-Cheol Kim
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2018-01-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.