Literature DB >> 17202254

Neural substrates of envisioning the future.

Karl K Szpunar1, Jason M Watson, Kathleen B McDermott.   

Abstract

The ability to envision specific future episodes is a ubiquitous mental phenomenon that has seldom been discussed in the neuroscience literature. In this study, subjects underwent functional MRI while using event cues (e.g., Birthday) as a guide to vividly envision a personal future event, remember a personal memory, or imagine an event involving a familiar individual. Two basic patterns of data emerged. One set of regions (e.g., within left lateral premotor cortex; left precuneus; right posterior cerebellum) was more active while envisioning the future than while recollecting the past (and more active in both of these conditions than in the task involving imagining another person). These regions appear similar to those emerging from the literature on imagined (simulated) bodily movements. A second set of regions (e.g., bilateral posterior cingulate; bilateral parahippocampal gyrus; left occipital cortex) demonstrated indistinguishable activity during the future and past tasks (but greater activity in both tasks than the imagery control task); similar regions have been shown to be important for remembering previously encountered visual-spatial contexts. Hence, differences between the future and past tasks are attributed to differences in the demands placed on regions that underlie motor imagery of bodily movements, and similarities in activity for these two tasks are attributed to the reactivation of previously experienced visual-spatial contexts. That is, subjects appear to place their future scenarios in well known visual-spatial contexts. Our results offer insight into the fundamental and little-studied capacity of vivid mental projection of oneself in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17202254      PMCID: PMC1761910          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0610082104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  39 in total

1.  When zero is not zero: the problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI.

Authors:  C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Recollective qualities modulate hippocampal activation during autobiographical memory retrieval.

Authors:  Donna Rose Addis; Morris Moscovitch; Adrian P Crawley; Mary Pat McAndrews
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation.

Authors:  K K Kwong; J W Belliveau; D A Chesler; I E Goldberg; R M Weisskoff; B P Poncelet; D N Kennedy; B E Hoppel; M S Cohen; R Turner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The power of simulation: imagining one's own and other's behavior.

Authors:  Jean Decety; Julie Grèzes
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Neural systems engaged by planning: a PET study of the Tower of London task.

Authors:  S C Baker; R D Rogers; A M Owen; C D Frith; R J Dolan; R S Frackowiak; T W Robbins
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 6.  Brain structures participating in mental simulation of motor behavior: a neuropsychological interpretation.

Authors:  J Decety; D H Ingvar
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-02

Review 7.  "Memory of the future": an essay on the temporal organization of conscious awareness.

Authors:  D H Ingvar
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1985

8.  Episodic future thinking.

Authors:  Cristina M. Atance; Daniela K. O'Neill
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Ogawa; D W Tank; R Menon; J M Ellermann; S G Kim; H Merkle; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter; Donna Rose Addis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  171 in total

Review 1.  Implicit Memory, Constructive Memory, and Imagining the Future: A Career Perspective.

Authors:  Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-12-05

2.  Complimentary roles of the hippocampus and retrosplenial cortex in behavioral context discrimination.

Authors:  David M Smith; Jennifer Barredo; Sheri J Y Mizumori
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Counterfactual thinking: an fMRI study on changing the past for a better future.

Authors:  Nicole Van Hoeck; Ning Ma; Lisa Ampe; Kris Baetens; Marie Vandekerckhove; Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Component processes underlying future thinking.

Authors:  Arnaud D'Argembeau; Claudia Ortoleva; Sabrina Jumentier; Martial Van der Linden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

5.  Evidence for the default network's role in spontaneous cognition.

Authors:  Jessica R Andrews-Hanna; Jay S Reidler; Christine Huang; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Remembering and forecasting: The relation between autobiographical memory and episodic future thinking.

Authors:  Dorthe Berntsen; Annette Bohn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

7.  Evidence for an implicit influence of memory on future thinking.

Authors:  Karl K Szpunar
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

8.  The default network and the combination of cognitive processes that mediate self-generated thought.

Authors:  Vadim Axelrod; Geraint Rees; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2017-12-04

9.  Combining fMRI with EEG and MEG in order to relate patterns of brain activity to cognition.

Authors:  Walter J Freeman; Seppo P Ahlfors; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 2.997

10.  Affective value and associative processing share a cortical substrate.

Authors:  Amitai Shenhav; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.