Literature DB >> 17201842

Laser assistance for extraction of chronically implanted endocardial leads: infectious versus noninfectious indications.

Sydney L Gaynor1, Andreas Zierer, Jennifer S Lawton, Marye J Gleva, Ralph J Damiano, Marc R Moon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Powered sheaths, including Excimer laser sheaths, were introduced for the removal of transvenous pacing and defibrillator leads. The purpose of this study was to develop an algorithm to better predict which patients are likely to benefit from these devices.
METHODS: We reviewed 283 consecutive patients in whom a total of 500 leads (302 pacing and 198 defibrillator leads) were extracted over a 5-year period at our operative facilities. Laser assist was utilized whenever moderate traction failed.
RESULTS: In 128 patients, 203 leads were removed for noninfectious indication. In 155 patients, 297 leads for infectious indications, including sepsis 22% (111), pocket infection 23% (115), and erosion 14% (71). Laser assistance was required for 6%+/- 5% (+/- 95% confidence interval) of septic leads, 51%+/- 7% of leads associated with erosion or pocket infection and 60%+/- 7% of noninfected leads (P = 0.001). Laser assistance was necessary more often for leads implanted >12 months (53%+/- 5%) than 12 months or less (6%+/- 5%) (P = 0.001) and for ventricular (52%+/- 6%) compared to atrial (35%+/- 7%) leads (P = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Chronically implanted leads (>12 months), especially noninfected leads and leads associated with erosion or pocket infection, should be referred for extraction with powered sheaths to ensure successful removal. However, leads that are associated with systemic sepsis can generally be removed without powered sheaths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17201842     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00547.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

Review 1.  [ICD lead defects: diagnosis and therapeutical options].

Authors:  Christian G Wollmann; Dirk Böcker; Andreas Löher; Hans H Scheld; Günter Breithardt; Rainer Gradaus
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2009-02-11

2.  Management of a remnant electrode in a patient with cardioverter-defibrillator infection after refusal of intravascular electrode removal.

Authors:  Sunghwahn Hahn; Jihwan Kim; Jung Hyun Choi; Seong-Hoon Lim; Tae Soo Kang; Byoung Eun Park; Myung-Yong Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.243

3.  Timing of device reimplantation and reinfection rates following cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Derek Chew; Ranjani Somayaji; John Conly; Derek Exner; Elissa Rennert-May
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.