Literature DB >> 17201787

Try it, you'll like it: the influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer.

Leonard Lee1, Shane Frederick, Dan Ariely.   

Abstract

Patrons of a pub evaluated regular beer and "MIT brew" (regular beer plus a few drops of balsamic vinegar) in one of three conditions. One group tasted the samples blind (the secret ingredient was never disclosed). A second group was informed of the contents before tasting. A third group learned of the secret ingredient immediately after tasting, but prior to indicating their preference. Not surprisingly, preference for the MIT brew was higher in the blind condition than in either of the two disclosure conditions. However, the timing of the information mattered substantially. Disclosure of the secret ingredient significantly reduced preference only when the disclosure preceded tasting, suggesting that disclosure affected preferences by influencing the experience itself, rather than by acting as an independent negative input or by modifying retrospective interpretation of the experience.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17201787     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01829.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  25 in total

1.  Neural responses to unattended products predict later consumer choices.

Authors:  Anita Tusche; Stefan Bode; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Subtle linguistic cues influence perceived blame and financial liability.

Authors:  Caitlin M Fausey; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-10

3.  Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness.

Authors:  Hilke Plassmann; John O'Doherty; Baba Shiv; Antonio Rangel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The Food Marketing Defense Model: Integrating Psychological Research to Protect Youth and Inform Public Policy.

Authors:  Jennifer L Harris; Kelly D Brownell; John A Bargh
Journal:  Soc Issues Policy Rev       Date:  2009-12-01

5.  Television viewing and unhealthy diet: implications for children and media interventions.

Authors:  Jennifer L Harris; John A Bargh
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2009-10

6.  Eww she sneezed! Contamination context affects children's food preferences and consumption.

Authors:  Jasmine M DeJesus; Kristin Shutts; Katherine D Kinzler
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Placebo effect of medication cost in Parkinson disease: a randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  Alberto J Espay; Matthew M Norris; James C Eliassen; Alok Dwivedi; Matthew S Smith; Christi Banks; Jane B Allendorfer; Anthony E Lang; David E Fleck; Michael J Linke; Jerzy P Szaflarski
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Limbic activation to novel versus familiar food cues predicts food preference and alcohol intake.

Authors:  Michael Michaelides; Michael L Miller; Mike Subrize; Ronald Kim; Lisa Robison; Yasmin L Hurd; Gene-Jack Wang; Nora D Volkow; Panayotis K Thanos
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 9.  Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.

Authors:  Pierre Chandon; Brian Wansink
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 6.846

10.  Effects of social sustainability signaling on neural valuation signals and taste-experience of food products.

Authors:  Laura Enax; Vanessa Krapp; Alexandra Piehl; Bernd Weber
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.