Literature DB >> 17201572

The influence of outcome desirability on optimism.

Zlatan Krizan1, Paul D Windschitl.   

Abstract

People are often presumed to be vulnerable to a desirability bias, namely, a tendency to be overoptimistic about a future outcome as a result of their preferences or desires for that outcome. In this article, this form of wishful thinking is distinguished from the more general concepts of motivated reasoning and overoptimism, and the evidence for this bias is reviewed. The authors argue that despite the prevalence of the idea that desires bias optimism, the empirical evidence regarding this possibility is limited. The potential for desires to depress rather than enhance optimism is discussed, and the authors advocate for greater research attention to mediators of both types of effects. Nine possible mediational accounts are described, and critical issues for future research on the desirability bias are discussed. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17201572     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.95

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  16 in total

Review 1.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Neural correlates of wishful thinking.

Authors:  Tatjana Aue; Howard C Nusbaum; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  College smokers' estimates of their probabilities of remaining a smoker in the near future.

Authors:  Isaac Lipkus; James Shepperd
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2009-05

4.  Predicting World Cup results: do goals seem more likely when they pay off?

Authors:  Maya Bar-Hillel; David V Budescu; Moty Amar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

5.  The influence of social comparison on visual representation of one's face.

Authors:  Ethan Zell; Emily Balcetis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Explanatory Judgment, Moral Offense and Value-Free Science.

Authors:  Matteo Colombo; Leandra Bucher; Yoel Inbar
Journal:  Rev Philos Psychol       Date:  2015-08-16

7.  Valence-Dependent Belief Updating: Computational Validation.

Authors:  Bojana Kuzmanovic; Lionel Rigoux
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-29

8.  Unrealistic comparative optimism: An unsuccessful search for evidence of a genuinely motivational bias.

Authors:  Adam J L Harris; Laura de Molière; Melinda Soh; Ulrike Hahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Managing the psychology of health care: what it means and what it is worth.

Authors:  Ilan Shahin
Journal:  Mcgill J Med       Date:  2008-07

10.  Varying expectancies and attention bias in phobic and non-phobic individuals.

Authors:  Tatjana Aue; Raphaël Guex; Léa A S Chauvigné; Hadas Okon-Singer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.