Literature DB >> 17201534

Visual memory for shapes in deaf signers and nonsigners and in hearing signers and nonsigners: atypical lateralization and enhancement.

Allegra Cattani1, John Clibbens, Timothy J Perfect.   

Abstract

Deaf and hearing individuals who either used sign language (signers) or not (nonsigners) were tested on visual memory for objects and shapes that were difficult to describe verbally with a same/different matching paradigm. The use of 4 groups was designed to permit a separation of effects related to sign language use (signers vs. nonsigners) and effects related to auditory deprivation (deaf vs. hearing). Forty deaf native signers and nonsigners and 51 hearing signers and nonsigners participated in the study. Signing individuals (both deaf and hearing) were more accurate than nonsigning individuals (deaf and hearing) at memorizing shapes. For the shape memory task but not the object task, deaf signers and nonsigners displayed right hemisphere (RH) advantage over the left hemisphere (LH). Conversely, both hearing groups displayed a memory advantage for shapes in the LH over the RH. Results indicate that enhanced memory performance for shapes in signers (deaf and hearing) stems from the visual skills acquired through sign language use and that deafness, irrespective of language background, leads to the use of a visually based strategy for memory of difficult-to-describe items. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17201534     DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.21.1.114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychology        ISSN: 0894-4105            Impact factor:   3.295


  7 in total

1.  Sign language aphasia from a neurodegenerative disease.

Authors:  Adam D Falchook; Rachel I Mayberry; Howard Poizner; David Brandon Burtis; Leilani Doty; Kenneth M Heilman
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 0.881

2.  Auditory deprivation affects biases of visuospatial attention as measured by line bisection.

Authors:  Zaira Cattaneo; Carlotta Lega; Carlo Cecchetto; Costanza Papagno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Don't Assume Deaf Students are Visual Learners.

Authors:  Marc Marschark; Allan Paivio; Linda J Spencer; Andreana Durkin; Georgianna Borgna; Carol Convertino; Elizabeth Machmer
Journal:  J Dev Phys Disabil       Date:  2016-06-02

4.  Evidence for superior encoding of detailed visual memories in deaf signers.

Authors:  Michael Craig; Michaela Dewar; Graham Turner; Trudi Collier; Narinder Kapur
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Enhanced spontaneous functional connectivity of the superior temporal gyrus in early deafness.

Authors:  Hao Ding; Dong Ming; Baikun Wan; Qiang Li; Wen Qin; Chunshui Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Deprivation of Auditory Experience Influences Numerosity Discrimination, but Not Numerosity Estimation.

Authors:  Alessia Tonelli; Irene Togoli; Roberto Arrighi; Monica Gori
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-29

7.  Manual Movement in Sign Languages: One Hand Versus Two in Communicating Shapes.

Authors:  Casey Ferrara; Donna Jo Napoli
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.