Literature DB >> 17200828

Combined effect of staining substances on the discoloration of esthetic Class V dental restorative materials.

Yong-Keun Lee1, John M Powers.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the combined effect of an organic substance (mucin as a substitute for salivary organic substances), chlorhexidine, and an iron compound/tea solution on the changes in the color of esthetic Class V dental restorative materials. Color of a glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, compomer and flowable resin composite of A2 shade, respectively, was determined according to the CIELAB color scale relative to the standard illuminant D65. Color was measured at baseline, and after sequential immersion in the following substances: Step-1, mucin in PBS (MCP) for 48 h; Step-2, chlorhexidine (CHX) for 24 h; Step-3, iron compound (IRN) or tea solution (TEA) up to 7 days; and Step-4, ultrasonic cleaning for 1 h. Color change (DeltaE(ab )*) was calculated by the equation: DeltaE(ab)* = [(DeltaL*)(2) + (Deltaa*)(2) + (Deltab*)(2)](1/2), of which DeltaL(*) indicates changes in value, Deltaa(*) indicates changes in red-green parameter and Deltab(*) indicates changes in yellow-blue parameter. DeltaE(ab)* values after immersion in MCP and CHX were compared, and DeltaE(ab)* values after immersion in IRN or TEA, and subsequent ultrasonic cleaning were compared with respect to the restorative material and immersion substance. DeltaE(ab)* and changes in the color parameters (DeltaL(*), DeltaC(ab)* and DeltaH(ab)*) were analyzed by repeated measures, analysis of variance and a post-hoc test at the 0.05 level of significance. Color changes after immersion in MCP were acceptable (DeltaE(ab)* < 3.3), and those after immersion in CHX were generally acceptable. The range of DeltaE(ab)* values after immersion in IRN was 3.1-19.6, and that after ultrasonic cleaning was 2.4-9.6. The range of DeltaE(ab)* values after immersion in TEA was 10.7-21.1, and that after ultrasonic cleaning was 11.9-14.5. Color changes of four Class V restorative materials after combined treatment with mucin, chlorhexidine and an iron compound/tea solution were not acceptable. Colors did not recover to their original values after ultrasonic cleaning. Modifications on the surface of a restoration should be considered to reduce stain accumulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17200828     DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-0676-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med        ISSN: 0957-4530            Impact factor:   3.896


  27 in total

1.  Color stability of restorative resins.

Authors:  Z A Khokhar; M E Razzoog; P Yaman
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.677

2.  Denture plaque distribution and the effectiveness of a perborate-containing denture cleanser.

Authors:  S B Keng; M Lim
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.677

3.  The propensity of different brands of tea and coffee to cause staining associated with chlorhexidine.

Authors:  A Leard; M Addy
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 8.728

4.  An epidemiologic study of factors affecting extrinsic staining of teeth in an English population.

Authors:  L Ness; D de L Rosekrans; J F Welford
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 3.383

5.  Color stability of dental composite resin materials for crown and bridge veneers.

Authors:  I E Ruyter; K Nilner; B Moller
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Extrinsic dental stain caused by chlorhexidine and other denaturing agents.

Authors:  J E Ellingsen; G Rølla; H M Eriksen
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 8.728

7.  Light microscopic and color television image analysis of the development of staining on chlorhexidine-treated surfaces.

Authors:  M Addy; S W Prayitno
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 6.993

8.  In vivo early human dental plaque formation on different supporting substances. A scanning electron microscopic and bacteriological study.

Authors:  B E Siegrist; M C Brecx; F A Gusberti; A Joss; N P Lang
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1991 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Influence of dietary simulating solvents on the hardness of provisional restorative materials.

Authors:  Adrian U J Yap; Michael K S Mah; Clement P W Lye; P L Loh
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  The use of polymethylmethacrylate to compare the adsorption and staining reactions of some cationic antiseptics.

Authors:  M Addy; W R Roberts
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 6.993

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effect of mouthwashes on the discolouration of restorative materials commonly used in paediatric dentistry.

Authors:  N B Ulusoy; V Arikan; A Akbay Oba
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2018-05-16

2.  Comparison of color stability of a composite resin in different color media.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Malekipour; Ala Sharafi; Shantia Kazemi; Saber Khazaei; Farzaneh Shirani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.