PURPOSE: The interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) gene possesses an unusual structure, encoding multiple Repeats, each consisting of about 300 amino acids. Our goals were to gain insight into the function of IRBP, and to test the current model for the evolution of IRBP, in which Repeats were replicated from a simpler ancestral gene. METHODS: We employed a bioinformatics approach to analyze IRBP loci in recently completed or near-complete genome sequences of several vertebrates and nonvertebrate chordates. IRBP gene expression in zebrafish was evaluated by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and in situ mRNA hybridizations with gene-specific probes. RESULTS: Patterns of exons and introns in the IRBP genes of tetrapods were highly similar, as were predicted amino acid sequences and Repeat structures. IRBP gene structure in teleost fish was more variable, and we report a new gene structure for two species, the Japanese puffer fish (Takifugu rubripes) and the zebrafish (Danio rerio). These teleost genomes contain a two-gene IRBP locus arranged head-to-tail in which the first gene, Gene 1, is intronless and contains a single large exon encoding three complete Repeats. It is followed by a second gene, Gene 2, which corresponds to the previously reported gene consisting of two Repeats spread across four exons and three introns. Each of the two zebrafish genes is transcribed. Gene 2 is expressed in the photoreceptors and RPE, and Gene 1 is expressed in the inner nuclear layer and weakly in the ganglion cell layer. CONCLUSIONS: The tetrapod IRBP gene structure is highly conserved while the teleost fish gene structure was a surprise: It appears to be a two-gene locus with distinct Repeat organization in each open reading frame. This gene structure and gene expression data are consistent with possible neofunctionalization or sub-function partitioning of Gene 1 and Gene 2 in the zebrafish. We suggest that the two-gene locus in teleost fish arose as a consequence of either the known whole genome duplication or single gene tandem duplication.
PURPOSE: The interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) gene possesses an unusual structure, encoding multiple Repeats, each consisting of about 300 amino acids. Our goals were to gain insight into the function of IRBP, and to test the current model for the evolution of IRBP, in which Repeats were replicated from a simpler ancestral gene. METHODS: We employed a bioinformatics approach to analyze IRBP loci in recently completed or near-complete genome sequences of several vertebrates and nonvertebrate chordates. IRBP gene expression in zebrafish was evaluated by reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) and in situ mRNA hybridizations with gene-specific probes. RESULTS: Patterns of exons and introns in the IRBP genes of tetrapods were highly similar, as were predicted amino acid sequences and Repeat structures. IRBP gene structure in teleost fish was more variable, and we report a new gene structure for two species, the Japanese puffer fish (Takifugu rubripes) and the zebrafish (Danio rerio). These teleost genomes contain a two-gene IRBP locus arranged head-to-tail in which the first gene, Gene 1, is intronless and contains a single large exon encoding three complete Repeats. It is followed by a second gene, Gene 2, which corresponds to the previously reported gene consisting of two Repeats spread across four exons and three introns. Each of the two zebrafish genes is transcribed. Gene 2 is expressed in the photoreceptors and RPE, and Gene 1 is expressed in the inner nuclear layer and weakly in the ganglion cell layer. CONCLUSIONS: The tetrapod IRBP gene structure is highly conserved while the teleost fish gene structure was a surprise: It appears to be a two-gene locus with distinct Repeat organization in each open reading frame. This gene structure and gene expression data are consistent with possible neofunctionalization or sub-function partitioning of Gene 1 and Gene 2 in the zebrafish. We suggest that the two-gene locus in teleost fish arose as a consequence of either the known whole genome duplication or single gene tandem duplication.
Authors: M M Benning; K L Taylor; G Yang; H Xiang; G Wesenberg; D Dunaway-Mariano; H M Holden Journal: Biochemistry Date: 1996-06-25 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: C A Baer; K L Kittredge; A L Klinger; D M Briercheck; M S Braiman; F Gonzalez-Fernandez Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 1994-06 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: B B Wagenhorst; R R Rajendran; E E Van Niel; R B Hessler; A Bukelman; F Gonzalez-Fernandez Journal: J Mol Evol Date: 1995-11 Impact factor: 2.395
Authors: R R Rajendran; E E Van Niel; D L Stenkamp; L L Cunningham; P A Raymond; F Gonzalez-Fernandez Journal: J Exp Biol Date: 1996-12 Impact factor: 3.312
Authors: Bhavani Kashyap; Laurel Pegorsch; Ruth A Frey; Chi Sun; Eric A Shelden; Deborah L Stenkamp Journal: Reprod Toxicol Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 3.143
Authors: Federico Gonzalez-Fernandez; Thomas Bevilacqua; Kee-Il Lee; Reena Chandrashekar; Larson Hsu; Mary Alice Garlipp; Jennifer B Griswold; Rosalie K Crouch; Debashis Ghosh Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Marcus P S Dekens; Bruno M Fontinha; Miguel Gallach; Sandra Pflügler; Kristin Tessmar-Raible Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Mason Posner; Molly Hawke; Carrie Lacava; Courtney J Prince; Nicholas R Bellanco; Rebecca W Corbin Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2008-04-25 Impact factor: 2.367