PURPOSE: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma of the intestinal tract. Nearly all tumors express KIT protein, and most have an activating mutation in either KIT or PDGFRA. Therapy with selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors achieves a partial response or stable disease in approximately 80% of patients with advanced GIST. However, after an initial clinical response, some patients develop imatinib resistance. Our goal was to investigate the spectrum of pathologic response and molecular alterations in a group of GIST patients, clinically defined as having imatinib-stable/imatinib-responsive lesions, who underwent surgical resection. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-three tumor nodules from 28 patients were available for pathologic and molecular analysis, which included genotyping for primary and secondary KIT/PDGFRA-mutations, cell cycle alterations, and biochemical activation status of KIT and downstream targets. The transcriptional changes of a subset of these tumors were compared with a group of imatinib-naive GISTs on a U133A Affymetrix expression platform. RESULTS: The histologic response did not correlate with imatinib therapy duration or with proliferative activity. Second-site KIT mutation was identified in only one tumor nodule. Activation of KIT and downstream targets was consistent in all tumors analyzed. Ultrastructurally, a subset of tumors showed a smooth muscle phenotype, which correlated with overexpression of genes involved in muscle differentiation and function. CONCLUSIONS: The histologic response to imatinib is heterogeneous and does not correlate well with clinical response. Second-site KIT mutations are rare in imatinib-responsive GISTs compared with imatinib-resistant tumors. The gene signature of imatinib-response in GISTs showed alterations of cell cycle control as well as up-regulation of genes involved in muscle differentiation and function.
PURPOSE:Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common sarcoma of the intestinal tract. Nearly all tumors express KIT protein, and most have an activating mutation in either KIT or PDGFRA. Therapy with selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors achieves a partial response or stable disease in approximately 80% of patients with advanced GIST. However, after an initial clinical response, some patients develop imatinib resistance. Our goal was to investigate the spectrum of pathologic response and molecular alterations in a group of GIST patients, clinically defined as having imatinib-stable/imatinib-responsive lesions, who underwent surgical resection. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Forty-three tumor nodules from 28 patients were available for pathologic and molecular analysis, which included genotyping for primary and secondary KIT/PDGFRA-mutations, cell cycle alterations, and biochemical activation status of KIT and downstream targets. The transcriptional changes of a subset of these tumors were compared with a group of imatinib-naive GISTs on a U133A Affymetrix expression platform. RESULTS: The histologic response did not correlate with imatinib therapy duration or with proliferative activity. Second-site KIT mutation was identified in only one tumor nodule. Activation of KIT and downstream targets was consistent in all tumors analyzed. Ultrastructurally, a subset of tumors showed a smooth muscle phenotype, which correlated with overexpression of genes involved in muscle differentiation and function. CONCLUSIONS: The histologic response to imatinib is heterogeneous and does not correlate well with clinical response. Second-site KIT mutations are rare in imatinib-responsive GISTs compared with imatinib-resistant tumors. The gene signature of imatinib-response in GISTs showed alterations of cell cycle control as well as up-regulation of genes involved in muscle differentiation and function.
Authors: Junwei Chen; Tianhua Guo; Lei Zhang; Li-Xuan Qin; Samuel Singer; Robert G Maki; Takahiro Taguchi; Ronald Dematteo; Peter Besmer; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: George D Demetri; Margaret von Mehren; Cristina R Antonescu; Ronald P DeMatteo; Kristen N Ganjoo; Robert G Maki; Peter W T Pisters; Chandrajit P Raut; Richard F Riedel; Scott Schuetze; Hema M Sundar; Jonathan C Trent; Jeffrey D Wayne Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Juan-Miguel Mosquera; Andrea Sboner; Lei Zhang; Chun-Liang Chen; Yun-Shao Sung; Hsiao-Wei Chen; Narasimhan P Agaram; Daniel Briskin; Basma M Basha; Samuel Singer; Mark A Rubin; Thomas Tuschl; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Teresa S Kim; Michael J Cavnar; Noah A Cohen; Eric C Sorenson; Jonathan B Greer; Adrian M Seifert; Megan H Crawley; Benjamin L Green; Rachel Popow; Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty; Darren R Veach; Anson T Ku; Ferdinand Rossi; Peter Besmer; Cristina R Antonescu; Shan Zeng; Ronald P Dematteo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 12.531