Literature DB >> 17200223

BiDil for heart failure in black patients: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration perspective.

Robert Temple1, Norman L Stockbridge.   

Abstract

Critics of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the fixed combination of hydralazine hydrochloride, 37.5 mg, and isosorbide dinitrate, 20 mg, for treating heart failure in black patients have suggested that data were insufficient to distinguish treatment effects in black and white people; that distinctions based on race, rather than pathophysiology, were scientifically unreasonable; and that a "race-based" approval could be a commercial ploy to avoid a more expensive and prolonged full evaluation of a drug. The criticisms acknowledge that data supporting the approval came from a well-designed clinical trial in which self-identified black patients with heart failure who took hydralazine hydrochloride-isosorbide dinitrate with standard therapy experienced a statistically significant 43% (95% CI, 11% to 63%) reduction in mortality compared with those who took only the standard therapy. The criticisms do not always recognize that the decision to conduct the trial in only black patients reflected careful analyses of 2 previous trials in racially mixed patient populations that compared hydralazine hydrochloride-isosorbide dinitrate with placebo or with enalapril. Both trials showed little or no overall effect of hydralazine hydrochloride-isosorbide dinitrate in the mostly white patient population but hinted at a substantial effect in subsets of black patients. Perhaps most critically, the criticisms do not appreciate the urgency of strong scientific evidence of a substantial survival benefit in black patients. A serious attempt to avoid race-based approval by mandating study of a mixed population to identify a possible white patient-responder subset, particularly without a plausible hypothesis as to what that subset might be, would have required years of work, many thousands of patients, and wholly unreasonable delay in approval of a treatment whose effectiveness had been well-documented in the group for which it was intended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17200223     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-1-200701020-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  31 in total

1.  Mapping genes that predict treatment outcome in admixed populations.

Authors:  T M Baye; R A Wilke
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.550

2.  The FDA regulatory process for drug and genetic diagnostic test approvals.

Authors:  Michael R Bristow; William R Hiatt
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.689

3.  Flaws in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's rationale for supporting the development and approval of BiDil as a treatment for heart failure only in black patients.

Authors:  George T H Ellison; Jay S Kaufman; Rosemary F Head; Paul A Martin; Jonathan D Kahn
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Genomes, race and health. Racial profiling in medicine might just be a stepping stone towards personalized health care.

Authors:  Howard Wolinsky
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 5.  Importance of Genetic Studies of Cardiometabolic Disease in Diverse Populations.

Authors:  Lindsay Fernández-Rhodes; Kristin L Young; Adam G Lilly; Laura M Raffield; Heather M Highland; Genevieve L Wojcik; Cary Agler; Shelly-Ann M Love; Samson Okello; Lauren E Petty; Mariaelisa Graff; Jennifer E Below; Kimon Divaris; Kari E North
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Drug-induced QT interval prolongation: does ethnicity of the thorough QT study population matter?

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Mixed Race: Understanding Difference in the Genome Era.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Phillips; Adebola O Odunlami; Vence L Bonham
Journal:  Soc Forces       Date:  2007-12

Review 8.  Hypertension Treatment in Blacks: Discussion of the U.S. Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Stephen K Williams; Joseph Ravenell; Sara Seyedali; Sam Nayef; Gbenga Ogedegbe
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 8.194

9.  Race and ancestry in biomedical research: exploring the challenges.

Authors:  Timothy Caulfield; Stephanie M Fullerton; Sarah E Ali-Khan; Laura Arbour; Esteban G Burchard; Richard S Cooper; Billie-Jo Hardy; Simrat Harry; Robyn Hyde-Lay; Jonathan Kahn; Rick Kittles; Barbara A Koenig; Sandra Sj Lee; Michael Malinowski; Vardit Ravitsky; Pamela Sankar; Stephen W Scherer; Béatrice Séguin; Darren Shickle; Guilherme Suarez-Kurtz; Abdallah S Daar
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 10.  Inclusion of women in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jesse A Berlin; Susan S Ellenberg
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 8.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.