BACKGROUND: Adequacy of margins is important for local recurrence control in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. This study aims to compare the accuracy of intraoperative specimen ultrasonography (IOUS) and specimen mammography in the prediction of achieving adequate histologically tumour-free margins during breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: Between March 2003 and September 2004, a prospective study was carried out on 25 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery. After wide excision, IOUS and specimen mammography were used to assess adequacy of margins. Further surgery was undertaken when either method showed an inadequate margin. The margins were assessed histologically and correlated with IOUS and mammographic findings. RESULTS: Using IOUS alone, higher rates of histologically tumour-free margins were achieved compared with mammography alone. Combined IOUS and mammography achieved similar or slightly higher rates of histologically tumour-free margins compared with IOUS alone. If the margin measured on IOUS is twice the desired histological margin, this will result in achieving a histologically tumour-free rate of >90%. Associated ductal carcinoma in situ was the only significant factor found to decrease the rate of achieving adequate margins. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative specimen ultrasonography is useful in predicting histologically tumour-free margins during breast conserving surgery for cancer.
BACKGROUND: Adequacy of margins is important for local recurrence control in breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. This study aims to compare the accuracy of intraoperative specimen ultrasonography (IOUS) and specimen mammography in the prediction of achieving adequate histologically tumour-free margins during breast-conserving surgery. METHODS: Between March 2003 and September 2004, a prospective study was carried out on 25 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery. After wide excision, IOUS and specimen mammography were used to assess adequacy of margins. Further surgery was undertaken when either method showed an inadequate margin. The margins were assessed histologically and correlated with IOUS and mammographic findings. RESULTS: Using IOUS alone, higher rates of histologically tumour-free margins were achieved compared with mammography alone. Combined IOUS and mammography achieved similar or slightly higher rates of histologically tumour-free margins compared with IOUS alone. If the margin measured on IOUS is twice the desired histological margin, this will result in achieving a histologically tumour-free rate of >90%. Associated ductal carcinoma in situ was the only significant factor found to decrease the rate of achieving adequate margins. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative specimen ultrasonography is useful in predicting histologically tumour-free margins during breast conserving surgery for cancer.