OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mares are a clinically important source of Rhodococcus equi for their foals. SAMPLE POPULATION: 171 mares and 171 foals from a farm in Kentucky (evaluated during 2004 and 2005). PROCEDURES: At 4 time points (2 before and 2 after parturition), the total concentration of R equi and concentration of virulent R equi were determined in fecal specimens from mares by use of quantitative bacteriologic culture and a colony immunoblot technique, respectively. These concentrations for mares of foals that developed R equi-associated pneumonia and for mares with unaffected foals were compared. Data for each year were analyzed separately. RESULTS: R equi-associated pneumonia developed in 53 of 171 (31%) foals. Fecal shedding of virulent R equi was detected in at least 1 time point for every mare; bacteriologic culture results were positive for 62 of 171 (36%) mares at all time points. However, compared with dams of unaffected foals, fecal concentrations of total or virulent R equi in dams of foals with R equi-associated pneumonia were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicate that dams of foals with R equi-associated pneumonia did not shed more R equi in feces than dams of unaffected foals; therefore, R equi infection in foals was not associated with comparatively greater fecal shedding by their dams. However, detection of virulent R equi in the feces of all mares during at least 1 time point suggests that mares can be an important source of R equi for the surrounding environment.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether mares are a clinically important source of Rhodococcus equi for their foals. SAMPLE POPULATION: 171 mares and 171 foals from a farm in Kentucky (evaluated during 2004 and 2005). PROCEDURES: At 4 time points (2 before and 2 after parturition), the total concentration of R equi and concentration of virulent R equi were determined in fecal specimens from mares by use of quantitative bacteriologic culture and a colony immunoblot technique, respectively. These concentrations for mares of foals that developed R equi-associated pneumonia and for mares with unaffected foals were compared. Data for each year were analyzed separately. RESULTS: R equi-associated pneumonia developed in 53 of 171 (31%) foals. Fecal shedding of virulent R equi was detected in at least 1 time point for every mare; bacteriologic culture results were positive for 62 of 171 (36%) mares at all time points. However, compared with dams of unaffected foals, fecal concentrations of total or virulent R equi in dams of foals with R equi-associated pneumonia were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results indicate that dams of foals with R equi-associated pneumonia did not shed more R equi in feces than dams of unaffected foals; therefore, R equi infection in foals was not associated with comparatively greater fecal shedding by their dams. However, detection of virulent R equi in the feces of all mares during at least 1 time point suggests that mares can be an important source of R equi for the surrounding environment.
Authors: Kyle R Kuskie; Jacqueline L Smith; Naisyin Wang; Craig N Carter; M Keith Chaffin; Nathan M Slovis; Randolph S Stepusin; Anthony E Cattoi; Shinji Takai; Noah D Cohen Journal: Am J Vet Res Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 1.156
Authors: E J Summer; M Liu; J J Gill; M Grant; T N Chan-Cortes; L Ferguson; C Janes; K Lange; M Bertoli; C Moore; R C Orchard; N D Cohen; R Young Journal: Appl Environ Microbiol Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 4.792
Authors: William W Mohn; Maarten H Wilbrink; Israël Casabon; Gordon R Stewart; Jie Liu; Robert van der Geize; Lindsay D Eltis Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Angela I Bordin; Suresh D Pillai; Courtney Brake; Kaytee B Bagley; Jessica R Bourquin; Michelle Coleman; Fabiano N Oliveira; Waithaka Mwangi; David N McMurray; Charles C Love; Maria Julia B Felippe; Noah D Cohen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Priyanka Kachroo; Ivan Ivanov; Ashley G Seabury; Mei Liu; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Noah D Cohen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Canaan M Whitfield-Cargile; Noah D Cohen; Jan Suchodolski; M Keith Chaffin; Cole M McQueen; Carolyn E Arnold; Scot E Dowd; Glenn P Blodgett Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: S Álvarez-Narváez; L J Berghaus; E R A Morris; J M Willingham-Lane; N M Slovis; S Giguere; N D Cohen Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-01-22 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Noah D Cohen; Susanne K Kahn; Angela I Bordin; Giana M Gonzales; Bibiana Petri da Silveira; Jocelyne M Bray; Rebecca M Legere; Sophia C Ramirez-Cortez Journal: J Vet Intern Med Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.175