Literature DB >> 17198277

Increased immunosuppression, not anticoagulation, extends cardiac xenograft survival.

Guerard W Byrne1, William R Davies, Keiji Oi, Vinay P Rao, Sumeet S Teotia, David Ricci, Henry D Tazelaar, Randall C Walker, John S Logan, Christopher G A McGregor.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac xenograft function is lost due to delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) characterized by microvascular thrombosis and myocardial necrosis. The cause of DXR is unknown but may result from thrombosis induced by antibody-mediated activation of endothelial cells and/or by incompatibilities in thromboregulatory interactions.
METHODS: To examine these issues, a series (Groups 1-6) of previous transgenic CD46 pig-to-baboon heterotopic cardiac transplants were reanalyzed for baseline immunosuppressive levels, graft survival and infectious complications with and without systemic anticoagulation. Groups 1-4 received low dose tacrolimus and sirolimus maintenance therapy, with splenectomy, anti-CD20 and daily alpha-Gal polymer. Group 1 recipients received no anticoagulation. Groups 2-4 were anticoagulated with aspirin and Plavix, Lovenox, or Coumadin, respectively. Group 5 was treated with Lovenox and high dose tacrolimus and sirolimus maintenance therapy. Group 6 recipients received no postoperative anticoagulation but the same immunosuppression as group 5.
RESULTS: Median survival (15-22 days) within groups 1-4 was not significantly different. At rejection all tissues exhibited microvascular thrombosis, coagulative necrosis and similar levels of platelet and fibrin deposition. Groups 5 and 6 median survival (76 days) was significantly increased compared to groups 1-4. There was no significant difference in median survival between Lovenox treated recipients (68 days) and anticoagulant free recipients (96 days). Rejected tissues showed vascular antibody deposition, microvascular thrombosis, and myocyte necrosis.
CONCLUSION: Significant prolongation in xenograft survival is achieved by improved immunosuppression. These results suggest that ongoing immune responses remain the major stimulus for DXR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17198277     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000251387.40499.0f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  28 in total

Review 1.  Which anti-platelet therapies might be beneficial in xenotransplantation?

Authors:  Moritz Schmelzle; Peter J Cowan; Simon C Robson
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.907

2.  The utility of right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy for the diagnosis of xenograft rejection after CD46 pig-to-baboon cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Davide Ricci; Henry D Tazelaar; Naoto Miyagi; Vinay P Rao; Rachel A Pedersen; Walter K Kremers; Guerard W Byrne; Christopher G A McGregor
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 10.247

3.  Xenotransplantation as a model of integrated, multidisciplinary research.

Authors:  Emanuele Cozzi; Erika Bosio; Michela Seveso; Domenico Rubello; Ermanno Ancona
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Prolonged cardiac allograft survival using iodine 131 after human sodium iodide symporter gene transfer in a rat model.

Authors:  D Ricci; A A Mennander; N Miyagi; V P Rao; H D Tazelaar; K Classic; G W Byrne; S J Russell; C G A McGregor
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 5.  T-cell-mediated immunological barriers to xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Joseph Scalea; Isabel Hanecamp; Simon C Robson; Kazuhiko Yamada
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.907

6.  Reduced binding of human antibodies to cells from GGTA1/CMAH KO pigs.

Authors:  C Burlak; L L Paris; A J Lutz; R A Sidner; J Estrada; P Li; M Tector; A J Tector
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  Reduced positive selection of a human TCR in a swine thymus using a humanized mouse model for xenotolerance induction.

Authors:  Grace Nauman; Chiara Borsotti; Nichole Danzl; Mohsen Khosravi-Maharlooei; Hao-Wei Li; Estefania Chavez; Samantha Stone; Megan Sykes
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2019-09-29       Impact factor: 3.907

8.  Anti-inflammatory and anticoagulant effects of transgenic expression of human thrombomodulin in mice.

Authors:  S Crikis; X M Zhang; S Dezfouli; K M Dwyer; L M Murray-Segal; E Salvaris; C Selan; S C Robson; H H Nandurkar; P J Cowan; A J F d'Apice
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Immunobiological barriers to xenotransplantation.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Burcin Ekser; A Joseph Tector
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 10.  Achieving tolerance in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation: reality or fantasy.

Authors:  David H Sachs; Megan Sykes; Kazuhiko Yamada
Journal:  Transpl Immunol       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 1.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.