BACKGROUND: Fasting glucose measurements are insensitive at detecting new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) and ignore the diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Both NODAT and IGT confer a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease. IGT is also a risk factor for NODAT. The aim of this study was to use an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to risk stratify for NODAT and IGT in renal transplant recipients and to relate cardiovascular and phenotypic risk with glycemic dysregulation. METHODS: In all, 858 renal transplant recipients are under follow up at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK. Excluded patients had pretransplant diabetes (78), NODAT (89), or were transplanted less than six months (47), leaving 646 recipients. All remaining recipients with two fasting blood glucoses between 5.6 and 6.9 mmol/L were invited to have an OGTT. A diagnosis of NODAT, IGT, and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was based on World Health Organization guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 134 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of whom 122 had an OGTT (91% of cohort). In all, 51% of patients were found to have abnormal glucose metabolism: 10% NODAT, 14% combined IGT/IFG, 9% IGT alone, and 18% IFG alone. Clinical phenotype was not predictive of diabetic risk on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm fasting glucose underestimates the prevalence of NODAT and ignores the prevalence of IGT. These findings suggest routine use of an OGTT in renal transplant recipients is a valuable clinical tool to risk stratify each patient for the development of NODAT and cardiovascular disease.
BACKGROUND: Fasting glucose measurements are insensitive at detecting new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT) and ignore the diagnosis of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Both NODAT and IGT confer a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease. IGT is also a risk factor for NODAT. The aim of this study was to use an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) to risk stratify for NODAT and IGT in renal transplant recipients and to relate cardiovascular and phenotypic risk with glycemic dysregulation. METHODS: In all, 858 renal transplant recipients are under follow up at the University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK. Excluded patients had pretransplant diabetes (78), NODAT (89), or were transplanted less than six months (47), leaving 646 recipients. All remaining recipients with two fasting blood glucoses between 5.6 and 6.9 mmol/L were invited to have an OGTT. A diagnosis of NODAT, IGT, and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was based on World Health Organization guidelines. RESULTS: We identified 134 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of whom 122 had an OGTT (91% of cohort). In all, 51% of patients were found to have abnormal glucose metabolism: 10% NODAT, 14% combined IGT/IFG, 9% IGT alone, and 18% IFG alone. Clinical phenotype was not predictive of diabetic risk on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm fasting glucose underestimates the prevalence of NODAT and ignores the prevalence of IGT. These findings suggest routine use of an OGTT in renal transplant recipients is a valuable clinical tool to risk stratify each patient for the development of NODAT and cardiovascular disease.
Authors: S Fuji; A Rovó; K Ohashi; M Griffith; H Einsele; M Kapp; M Mohty; N S Majhail; B G Engelhardt; A Tichelli; B N Savani Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: A Sharif; M Hecking; A P J de Vries; E Porrini; M Hornum; S Rasoul-Rockenschaub; G Berlakovich; M Krebs; A Kautzky-Willer; G Schernthaner; P Marchetti; G Pacini; A Ojo; S Takahara; J L Larsen; K Budde; K Eller; J Pascual; A Jardine; S J L Bakker; T G Valderhaug; T G Jenssen; S Cohney; M D Säemann Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2014-08-06 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Patricia Delgado; Juan Manuel Diaz; Irene Silva; José M Osorio; Antonio Osuna; Beatriz Bayés; Ricardo Lauzurica; Edgar Arellano; Jose Maria Campistol; Rosa Dominguez; Carlos Gómez-Alamillo; Meritxell Ibernon; Francisco Moreso; Rocio Benitez; Ildefonso Lampreave; Esteban Porrini; Armando Torres Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-03-05 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Phuong-Thu T Pham; Phuong-Mai T Pham; Son V Pham; Phuong-Anh T Pham; Phuong-Chi T Pham Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Date: 2011-05-09 Impact factor: 3.168
Authors: Phuong-Thu T Pham; Kari L Edling; Harini A Chakkera; Phuong-Chi T Pham; Phuong-Mai T Pham Journal: Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Date: 2012-10-26 Impact factor: 3.168