Literature DB >> 17197966

Predictors of patient selection in bariatric surgery.

Heena P Santry1, Diane S Lauderdale, Kathleen A Cagney, Paul J Rathouz, John C Alverdy, Marshall H Chin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify sociodemographic and clinical predictors of patient selection in bariatric surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Population-based studies suggest that bariatric surgery patients are disproportionately privately insured, middle-aged white women. It is uncertain whether such disparities are due to surgeon decisions to operate, differences among morbidly obese individuals in access to surgery, or patients' personal preferences regarding surgical treatment.
METHODS: We conducted a national survey of 1343 U.S. bariatric surgeons. The questionnaire contained clinical vignettes generated using a balanced fractional factorial design. For each of 3 hypothetical patients unique in age, race, gender, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, social support, functional status, and insurance, respondents were asked if they would operate. Logistic regression was used to determine the odds of selection for each characteristic while controlling for the other 7 characteristics. Subset analyses were also performed using combinations of BMI and comorbidities.
RESULTS: A total of 62.5% of eligible surgeons responded (n = 820). Patient race did not influence surgeon decisions to operate. Hypothetical patient age, BMI, and social support were most influential. In the subgroup of patients who did not meet current NIH BMI and comorbidity criteria for bariatric surgery, male sex (odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.76) was associated with decreased odds of selection. Overall, younger age (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.07-0.11), older age (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.90), limited functional status (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52-0.82), poor social support (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.30-0.47), self-pay (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91), and public insurance (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.67) were associated with decreased odds of selection. BMI and comorbidity criteria influenced the magnitude of these effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient race did not play a role in surgeon decisions to operate. Further research should examine the roles of unequal access to bariatric surgery and differing socio-cultural perceptions of morbid obesity on racial disparities. The influence of patient age, gender, insurance status, social support, and functional status on decisions to operate was mitigated by BMI and comorbidities. Policy-makers currently debating BMI and comorbidity criteria for bariatric surgery should also consider guidelines pertaining to these sociodemographic issues that influence patient selection in bariatric surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17197966      PMCID: PMC1867947          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000232551.55712.b3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  58 in total

1.  Insurance decisions about obesity surgery: a new type of randomization?

Authors:  P Choban; B Lu; L Flancbaum
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  US nephrologists' recommendation of dialysis modality: results of a national survey.

Authors:  M Thamer; W Hwang; N E Fink; J H Sadler; S Wills; N W Levin; E B Bass; A S Levey; R Brookmeyer; N R Powe
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  National trends in utilization and outcomes of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  T L Trus; G D Pope; S R G Finlayson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Results after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in patients over 55 years of age.

Authors:  Gianfranco Silecchia; Francesco Greco; Vincenzo Bacci; Cristian Boru; Alessandro Pecchia; Giovanni Casella; Mario Rizzello; Nicola Basso
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.129

5.  Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  Selection of patients for anti-obesity surgery.

Authors:  J G Kral
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2001-05

7.  Gastric bypass in patients with BMI < 40 but > 32 without life-threatening co-morbidities: preliminary report.

Authors:  Mal Fobi; Hoil Lee; Daniel Igwe; Basil Felahy; Elaine James; Malgorzata Stanczyk; Nicole Fobi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Socioeconomic characteristics of the population eligible for obesity surgery.

Authors:  Edward H Livingston; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Lung cancer patient follow-up: motivation of thoracic surgeons.

Authors:  K S Virgo; K S Naunheim; M A Coplin; F E Johnson
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Effects of patient compliance, parental education and race on nephrologists' recommendations for kidney transplantation in children.

Authors:  Susan L Furth; Wenke Hwang; Alicia M Neu; Barbara A Fivush; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.086

View more
  31 in total

1.  Impact of bariatric surgery on health care utilization and costs among patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Sara N Bleich; Hsien-Yen Chang; Bryan Lau; Kimberly Steele; Jeanne M Clark; Thomas Richards; Jonathan P Weiner; Albert W Wu; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Inequity to the utilization of bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sanjit K Bhogal; Jacinta I Reddigan; Ori D Rotstein; Ashley Cohen; Dresden Glockler; Andrea C Tricco; Janet K Smylie; Stephen A Glazer; Jason Pennington; Lesley Gotlib Conn; Timothy D Jackson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  The impact of medicaid status on outcome after gastric bypass.

Authors:  J Wesley Alexander; Hope R Goodman; Lisa R Martin Hawver; Laura James
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Bariatric surgery: a history of empiricism, a future in science.

Authors:  John C Alverdy; Vivek Prachand; Brody Flanagan; William A Thistlethwaite; Mark Siegler; Marc Garfinkel; Peter Angelos; Shailesh Agarwal; Heena Santry
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Influence of ethnicity on the efficacy and utilization of bariatric surgery in the USA.

Authors:  Ranjan Sudan; Deborah Winegar; Steven Thomas; John Morton
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  The effect of Medicaid status on weight loss, hospital length of stay, and 30-day readmission after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Elsbeth Jensen-Otsu; Emily K Ward; Breana Mitchell; Jonathan A Schoen; Kevin Rothchild; Nia S Mitchell; Gregory L Austin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  The effect of pre-Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid eligibility expansion in New York State on access to specialty surgical care.

Authors:  Oluseyi Aliu; Katherine A Auger; Gordon H Sun; James F Burke; Colin R Cooke; Kevin C Chung; Rodney A Hayward
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Country of origin and bariatric surgery in Sweden during 2001-2010.

Authors:  Ensieh Memarian; Kristina Sundquist; Susanna Calling; Jan Sundquist; Xinjun Li
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  The Inequity of Bariatric Surgery: Publicly Insured Patients Undergo Lower Rates of Bariatric Surgery with Worse Outcomes.

Authors:  Dietric L Hennings; Maria Baimas-George; Zaid Al-Quarayshi; Rachel Moore; Emad Kandil; Christopher G DuCoin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Sociodemographic differences and time trends of bariatric surgery in Sweden 1990-2010.

Authors:  Ensieh Memarian; Susanna Calling; Kristina Sundquist; Jan Sundquist; Xinjun Li
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.