Literature DB >> 17197914

Atypical lipomatous tumor, its variants, and its combined forms: a study of 61 cases, with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

Harry L Evans1.   

Abstract

Sixty-one cases of neoplasms composed wholly or in part of atypical lipomatous tumor were reviewed. Minimum follow-up was 10 years. The cases were divided into 4 groups based on the findings in the initial excision specimen: conventional atypical lipomatous tumor (n=15), cellular atypical lipomatous tumor (n=21), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (n=24), and atypical lipomatous tumor with a pleomorphic liposarcoma-like component (n=1). The term "cellular atypical lipomatous tumor" was applied to atypical lipomatous tumors having areas of increased cellularity that when non-lipogenic lacked the 5 mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields (maximal rate) required for a dedifferentiated component and when lipogenic fell short of being truly pleomorphic liposarcoma-like. Myxoid regions within this spectrum sometimes had prominent or even plexiform vascularity, creating a resemblance to myxoid liposarcoma especially when interspersed small fat cells were present. The most important prognostic factor was tumor location, as none of the 12 patients with a subcutaneous or intramuscular neoplasm died of tumor. Among the 49 patients with neoplasms of central body sites (mostly retroperitoneum), those with dedifferentiated liposarcoma had significantly shorter survival (median 77 mo) than those with cellular (median 142 mo) or conventional (median 209 mo) atypical lipomatous tumor, whereas there was no statistically significant difference between the latter 2 categories. Patients with atypical lipomatous tumor (either cellular or conventional) in central body sites had significantly shorter survival if the tumor transformed into dedifferentiated liposarcoma in recurrence, and, conversely, those with central body site dedifferentiated liposarcoma had significantly longer survival if it recurred as atypical lipomatous tumor. Metastasis (7 cases) occurred only when the initial specimen or a recurrence demonstrated dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17197914     DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213406.95440.7a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol        ISSN: 0147-5185            Impact factor:   6.394


  33 in total

1.  Recurrent Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: a Case Report and Literature Review.

Authors:  D Ramu; Suraj Manjunath; G Anuradh
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-19

2.  Dermpath quiz.

Authors:  Viktoryia Kazlouskaya; Elen Blochin; Karan Lal; Paul M Parker; Dirk M Elston
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2013-10

3.  The degree of sclerosis is associated with prognosis in well-differentiated liposarcoma of the retroperitoneum.

Authors:  John S A Chrisinger; Tariq Al-Zaid; Emily Z Keung; Cheuk Leung; Heather Y Lin; Christina L Roland; Keila E Torres; Robert S Benjamin; Davis R Ingram; Samia Khan; Neeta Somaiah; Behrang Amini; Barry W Feig; Alexander J Lazar; Wei-Lien Wang
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the deep (paralaryngeal) soft tissue: lessons learnt from a case with a partly deceptively benign appearing dedifferentiated component.

Authors:  Fredrik Petersson; Euan Murugasu
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2013-07-06

5.  Novel dedifferentiated liposarcoma xenograft models reveal PTEN down-regulation as a malignant signature and response to PI3K pathway inhibition.

Authors:  Kathleen B Smith; Linh M Tran; Brenna M Tam; Elizabeth M Shurell; Yunfeng Li; Daniel Braas; William D Tap; Heather R Christofk; Sarah M Dry; Fritz C Eilber; Hong Wu
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 6.  [Modern morphological diagnosis and current classification of soft tissue sarcomas].

Authors:  D Katenkamp; K Katenkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Can Abdominal Computed Tomography Imaging Help Accurately Identify a Dedifferentiated Component in a Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma?

Authors:  Priya Bhosale; Jieqi Wang; Datla Varma; Corey Jensen; Madhavi Patnana; Wei Wei; Anil Chauhan; Barry Feig; Shreyaskumar Patel; Neeta Somaiah; Tara Sagebiel
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2016 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  A case of dedifferentiated solitary fibrous tumor of the thoracic cavity.

Authors:  Yoshio Masuda; Aiko Kurisaki-Arakawa; Kieko Hara; Atsushi Arakawa; Shiaki Oh; Kenji Suzuki; Takashi Yao; Tsuyoshi Saito
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-12-15

9.  Prognostic relevance of Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer grade and MDM2 amplification levels in dedifferentiated liposarcoma: a study of 50 cases.

Authors:  George Jour; Ashley Gullet; Mingdong Liu; Benjamin L Hoch
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  MRI characteristics of lipoma and atypical lipomatous tumor/well-differentiated liposarcoma: retrospective comparison with histology and MDM2 gene amplification.

Authors:  Mélanie Brisson; Takeshi Kashima; David Delaney; Roberto Tirabosco; Andrew Clarke; Suzie Cro; Adrienne M Flanagan; Paul O'Donnell
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.