Literature DB >> 17197058

How much influence do women in Sweden have on caesarean section? A follow-up study of women's preferences in early pregnancy.

Ingegerd Hildingsson1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to investigate factors associated with having a caesarean section, with special emphasis on women's preferences in early pregnancy.
DESIGN: a cohort study using data from questionnaires in early pregnancy and 2 months after childbirth, and data from the Swedish Medical Birth Register.
SETTING: women were recruited from 97% of all antenatal clinics in Sweden at their booking visit during 3 weeks between 1999 and 2000, and followed up 2 months after birth. PARTICIPANTS: a total of 2878 Swedish-speaking women were included in the study (87% of those who consented to participate and 63% of all women eligible for the study).
FINDINGS: Of 236 women who wished to have their babies delivered by caesarean section when asked in early pregnancy, 30.5% subsequently had an elective caesarean section and 14.8% an emergency caesarean section. The logistic regression analyses showed that, a preference for caesarean section in early pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 9.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.94-15.59), a medical diagnosis (OR 9.03, 95% CI 5.68-14.34), age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13), parity (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91), a previous elective caesarean section (OR 15.11, 95% CI 6.83-33.41) and a previous emergency caesarean section (OR 18.29, 95% CI 10.00-33.44) was associated with having an elective caesarean section. Having an emergency caesarean section was associated with a preference for a caesarean section (OR 2.59, 95% 1.61 to 4.18), a medical diagnosis (OR 4.12, 95% CI 2.91-5.88), age (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.05-1.12), primiparity (OR 3.34, 95% CI 1.78-6.27), a previous emergency caesarean section (OR 10.69, 95% CI 6.03-18.94), and a previous elective caesarean section (OR 7.21, 95% CI 2.90-17.92). KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: a woman's own preference about caesarean section was associated with the subsequent mode of delivery. Asking women about their preference regarding mode of delivery in early pregnancy may increase the opportunity to provide adequate support and possibly also to reduce the caesarean section rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17197058     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  11 in total

1.  Women's Experiences and Involvement in Decision-Making in Relation to Planned Cesarean Birth: An Interview Study.

Authors:  Purshaiyna Thirukumar; Amanda Henry; Dominiek Coates
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2021-10-01

2.  Strength of preference for vaginal birth as a predictor of delivery mode among women who attempt a vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Erica Wu; Anjali J Kaimal; Kathryn Houston; Lynn M Yee; Sanae Nakagawa; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Socioeconomic position early in adolescence and mode of delivery later in life: findings from a Portuguese birth cohort.

Authors:  Cristina Teixeira; Susana Silva; Milton Severo; Henrique Barros
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean delivery in first pregnancy?

Authors:  Ali Gholami; Shaker Salarilak
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-04

5.  Factors associated with preference for repeat cesarean in neyshabur pregnant women.

Authors:  Ali Gholami; Zahra Faraji; Pegah Lotfabadi; Zohre Foroozanfar; Mitra Rezaof; Abdolhalim Rajabi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2014-09

6.  Prenatal care and socioeconomic status: effect on cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Carine Milcent; Saad Zbiri
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2018-03-10

7.  Developing and pre-testing a decision board to facilitate informed choice about delivery approach in uncomplicated pregnancy.

Authors:  Jill Milne; Amiram Gafni; Diane Lu; Stephen Wood; Reg Sauve; Sue Ross
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Psychiatric illness in women requesting caesarean section.

Authors:  G Sydsjö; L Möller; C Lilliecreutz; M Bladh; E Andolf; A Josefsson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Influencing factors associated with the mode of birth among childbearing women in Hunan Province: a cross-sectional study in China.

Authors:  Yuhui Shi; Ying Jiang; Qingqi Zeng; Yanfei Yuan; Hui Yin; Chun Chang; Ruyan Pang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Caesarean delivery in south-western Iran: trends and determinants in a community-based survey.

Authors:  Najmeh Maharlouei; Mansoureh Moalaee; Saeed Ajdari; Maasoumeh Zarei; Kamran B Lankarani
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 1.927

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.