Literature DB >> 17196642

Use of preventive care by the working poor in the United States.

Joseph S Ross1, Susannah M Bernheim, Elizabeth H Bradley, Hsun-Mei Teng, William T Gallo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Examine the association between poverty and preventive care use among older working adults.
METHOD: Cross-sectional analysis of the pooled 1996, 1998 and 2000 waves of the Health and Retirement Study, a nationally representative sample of older community-dwelling adults, studying self-reported use of cervical, breast, and prostate cancer screening, as well as serum cholesterol screening and influenza vaccination. Adults with incomes within 200% of the federal poverty level were defined as poor.
RESULTS: Among 10,088 older working adults, overall preventive care use ranged from 38% (influenza vaccination) to 76% (breast cancer screening). In unadjusted analyses, the working poor were significantly less likely to receive preventive care. After adjustment for insurance coverage, education, and other socio-demographic characteristics, the working poor remained significantly less likely to receive breast cancer (RR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.86-0.96), prostate cancer (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.81-0.97), and cholesterol screening (RR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.86-0.96) than the working non-poor, but were not significantly less likely to receive cervical cancer screening (RR 0.96, 95% CI, 0.90-1.01) or influenza vaccination (RR 0.92, 95% CI, 0.84-1.01).
CONCLUSION: The older working poor are at modestly increased risk for not receiving preventive care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17196642      PMCID: PMC1810564          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  27 in total

1.  Lack of health insurance and decline in overall health in late middle age.

Authors:  D W Baker; J J Sudano; J M Albert; E A Borawski; A Dor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-10-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The accuracy of self-reported health behaviors and risk factors relating to cancer and cardiovascular disease in the general population: a critical review.

Authors:  S A Newell; A Girgis; R W Sanson-Fisher; N J Savolainen
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Kate M Brett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women.

Authors:  Usha Sambamoorthi; Donna D McAlpine
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Receipt of preventive care among adults: insurance status and usual source of care.

Authors:  Jennifer E DeVoe; George E Fryer; Robert Phillips; Larry Green
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Intermittent lack of health insurance coverage and use of preventive services.

Authors:  Joseph J Sudano; David W Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Wages, health benefits, and workers' health.

Authors:  Sara R Collins; Karen Davis; Michelle M Doty; Alice Ho
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2004-10

8.  Changes in health risks among the participants in the United Auto Workers--General Motors LifeSteps Health Promotion Program.

Authors:  L Yen; M P Edington; T McDonald; D Hirschland; D W Edington
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

9.  Use of health care services by lower-income and higher-income uninsured adults.

Authors:  Joseph S Ross; Elizabeth H Bradley; Susan H Busch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Access to care for children of the working poor.

Authors:  S Guendelman; M Pearl
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  Clarifying the positive association between education and prostate cancer: a Monte Carlo simulation approach.

Authors:  Tetyana Pudrovska; Andriy Anishkin
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-03-21

2.  Iowa certified nursing assistants study: self-reported ratings of the nursing home work environment.

Authors:  Kennith Culp; Sandra Ramey; Susan Karlman
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.571

3.  The emergency department as a potential intervention recruitment venue among vulnerable rural residents.

Authors:  Yelena N Tarasenko; Nancy E Schoenberg; Keisa L Bennett
Journal:  J Prim Care Community Health       Date:  2011-01-25

4.  Relation of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Dietary Pattern to Heart Failure Risk and Socioeconomic Status (from the Southern Community Cohort Study).

Authors:  Rachel S Chang; Meng Xu; Sarah H Brown; Sarah S Cohen; Danxia Yu; Elvis A Akwo; Debra Dixon; Loren Lipworth; Deepak K Gupta
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Empirical Analysis of Health Assessment Objective and Subjective Methods on the Determinants of Health.

Authors:  Abdou Khadre Dit Jadir Fall; Florence Migot-Nabias; Najoua Zidi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-09

6.  The Impact of Dependency Burden on Urban Household Health Expenditure and Its Regional Heterogeneity in China: Based on Quantile Regression Method.

Authors:  Xiaocang Xu; Qingqing Wang; Chang Li
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-04

7.  Prostate cancer severity among low income, uninsured men.

Authors:  David C Miller; Mark S Litwin; Jonathan Bergman; Sevan Stepanian; Sarah E Connor; Lorna Kwan; William J Aronson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Worksite Health Promotion for Low-Wage Workers: A Scoping Literature Review.

Authors:  Emily Stiehl; Namrata Shivaprakash; Esther Thatcher; India J Ornelas; Shawn Kneipp; Sherry L Baron; Naoko Muramatsu
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2017-09-12

9.  Urban-rural disparity in utilization of preventive care services in China.

Authors:  Xiang Liu; Ningxiu Li; Chaojie Liu; Xiaohui Ren; Danping Liu; Bo Gao; Yuanyuan Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Professionals' Perceptions: "Why is Lead Poisoning Prevalent in Lancaster County?"

Authors:  Harriet Okatch; Margaret Cherney; Brittany Mokshefsky; Madeline Kuon; Sarah Scheuring; Emily Ritchey; Jiayi Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.