Literature DB >> 17195934

Aftertreatment of malleolar fractures following ORIF -- functional compared to protected functional in a vacuum-stabilized orthesis: a randomized controlled trial.

Philipp Honigmann1, Sabine Goldhahn, Jan Rosenkranz, Laurent Audigé, Daniel Geissmann, Reto Babst.   

Abstract

In a monocenter randomized controlled trial, 45 patients with isolated malleolar fracture type OTA/AO 44 A1-B2 undergoing ORIF were allocated randomly to a postoperative treatment either with a vacuum-stabilized orthesis with prescribed full weight bearing after the second week (23 patients) (orthesis group -- OG) or with functional aftertreatment with partial weight bearing of 15 kg for 6 weeks (22 patients) (control group -- CG). Outcomes were compared at 6- and 10-week follow-up examinations. The Olerud and Molander ankle (OMA) score, ankle swelling, usage of crutches, range of motion, Short Form 12, patient-reported visual analogue scales (VAS) (pain, comfort, walking confidence) and time to return to work were evaluated. All patients of OG showed reduced swelling at discharge. The median OMA scores after 6 weeks were 42 and 42.5 (p = 0.46) and after 10 weeks 69 and 72 (p = 0.55) in the OG and CG, respectively. The time to achieve secure walking capacity was reduced by 1 day (p = 0.03) in the OG. After ORIF of simple malleolar fractures, patients with a vacuum-stabilized orthesis can bear full weight 2 weeks postoperatively. This group experienced no adverse events. Postoperative swelling was significantly reduced and of the ability to walk on stairs confidently was shorter as compared to a functional aftertreatment without any external stabilization of the ankle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17195934     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-006-0255-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  8 in total

1.  Tibiofibular screw fixation for syndesmotic ruptures: a biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  G Stein; C Eichler; L Ettmann; J Koebke; L P Müller; U Thelen; E Skouras
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Diagnosis of an isolated posterior malleolar fracture in a young female military cadet: a resident case report.

Authors:  Joseph M Miller; Steven J Svoboda; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-04

Review 3.  Weight-bearing and mobilization in the postoperative care of ankle fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.

Authors:  Diederik P J Smeeing; Roderick M Houwert; Jan Paul Briet; Johannes C Kelder; Michiel J M Segers; Egbert Jan M M Verleisdonk; Luke P H Leenen; Falco Hietbrink
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Immediate weight-bearing after ankle fracture fixation.

Authors:  Reza Firoozabadi; Emily Harnden; James C Krieg
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2015-02-16

Review 5.  Clinical research on postoperative trauma care: has the position of observational studies changed?

Authors:  D P J Smeeing; R M Houwert; M C Kruyt; O A J van der Meijden; F Hietbrink
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 6.  A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions.

Authors:  Aoife Healy; Sybil Farmer; Anand Pandyan; Nachiappan Chockalingam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The socioeconomic impact of orthopaedic trauma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nathan N O'Hara; Marckenley Isaac; Gerard P Slobogean; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Interventions for treating ankle fractures in children.

Authors:  Denise E Yeung; Xueli Jia; Clare A Miller; Simon L Barker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.