Literature DB >> 17195912

Role of the BRAF mutations in the microsatellite instability genetic pathway in sporadic colorectal cancer.

M L Maestro1, M Vidaurreta, M T Sanz-Casla, S Rafael, S Veganzones, A Martínez, C Aguilera, M D Herranz, J Cerdán, M Arroyo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Between 10 and 15% of all cases of colorectal cancer are the result of microsatellite instability (MSI) in the genetic pathway due to an alteration in the DNA repair genes. Tumors with high MSI are characterized by a better prognosis. The BRAF oncogene has been linked to the MSI pathway in tumorogenesis. The objective of this study was to determine whether alterations in BRAF are related to MSI and whether they can result in differences in survival rates.
METHODS: The study cohort comprised 351 patients diagnosed with sporadic colorectal cancer. MSI was determined in accordance with the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) recommendations by means of PCR and sequence analyses. Mutational analysis of the BRAF gene was performed by real-time PCR and subsequent sequencing of the altered samples. The methylation pattern of the hMLH1 gene was determined using methylation-specific PCR analyses of bisulfite-treated DNA and the results confirmed by sequencing.
RESULTS: Of the patients tested, 6.9% showed high MSI and 3.7% showed a BRAF gene mutation. hMLH1 methylation was observed in 67.2% of the patients with MSI and/or the BRAF alteration. The BRAF mutation was related to the MSI genetic pathway (P < 0.0001) and with hMLH1 methylation. In the analysis of overall survival only MSI had an independent prognostic value for the risk of death. Patients with the BRAF mutation showed a higher risk of death, although this association was found not to be statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a subgroup of carcinomas which develop via the MSI pathway that carry an alteration of the BRAF gene. This alteration confers a poorer outcome on these patients within the total group of patients with MSI who have a better prognosis. This hypothesis should be further investigated in a larger study population due to the low incidence of BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17195912     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9111-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  16 in total

Review 1.  Molecular and prognostic heterogeneity of microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Jung Ho Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prognostic significance of hMLH1/hMSH2 gene mutations and hMLH1 promoter methylation in sporadic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yibaina Wang; Dandan Li; Xia Li; Chong Teng; Lin Zhu; Binbin Cui; Yashuang Zhao; Fulan Hu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  The role of EGFR monoclonal antibodies (MoABs) cetuximab/panitumab, and BRAF inhibitors in BRAF mutated colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shan Muhammad; Zheng Jiang; Zheng Liu; Kavanjit Kaur; Xishan Wang
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-03

4.  Deficient DNA mismatch repair is associated with favorable prognosis in Thai patients with sporadic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Krittiya Korphaisarn; Ananya Pongpaibul; Chanin Limwongse; Ekkapong Roothumnong; Wipawi Klaisuban; Akarin Nimmannit; Artit Jinawath; Charuwan Akewanlop
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Deschoolmeester; Marc Baay; Pol Specenier; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-28

6.  BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry facilitates universal screening of colorectal cancers for Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Christopher W Toon; Michael D Walsh; Angela Chou; David Capper; Adele Clarkson; Loretta Sioson; Stephen Clarke; Scott Mead; Rhiannon J Walters; Mark Clendenning; Christophe Rosty; Joanne P Young; Aung Ko Win; John L Hopper; Ashley Crook; Andreas von Deimling; Mark A Jenkins; Daniel D Buchanan; Anthony J Gill
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Mutations in BRAF correlate with poor survival of colorectal cancers in Chinese population.

Authors:  Jyh-Ming Liou; Ming-Shiang Wu; Chia-Tung Shun; Han-Mo Chiu; Mei-Jyh Chen; Chien-Chuan Chen; Hsiu-Po Wang; Jaw-Town Lin; Jin-Tung Liang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Colorectal cancer in the very young: a comparative study of tumor markers, pathology and survival in early onset and adult onset patients.

Authors:  Sajid A Khan; Melinda Morris; Kamran Idrees; Mark I Gimbel; Shoshana Rosenberg; Zhaoshi Zeng; Fangyong Li; Geliang Gan; Jinru Shia; Michael P LaQuaglia; Philip B Paty
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Colorectal carcinomas with microsatellite instability display a different pattern of target gene mutations according to large bowel site of origin.

Authors:  Manuela Pinheiro; Terje Ahlquist; Stine A Danielsen; Guro E Lind; Isabel Veiga; Carla Pinto; Vera Costa; Luís Afonso; Olga Sousa; Maria Fragoso; Lúcio Santos; Rui Henrique; Paula Lopes; Carlos Lopes; Ragnhild A Lothe; Manuel R Teixeira
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Telomerase activity in colorectal cancer, prognostic factor and implications in the microsatellite instability pathway.

Authors:  M Vidaurreta; M-L Maestro; S Rafael; S Veganzones; M-T Sanz-Casla; J Cerdán; M Arroyo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.