HYPOTHESIS: Electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in the midbrain can provide a safe and efficacious alternative to auditory brainstem implants (ABIs). BACKGROUND: Patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) receive limited speech recognition with ABIs. Some ABI patients without NF2 can achieve excellent speech understanding, suggesting that the limited NF2 performance is due to brainstem damage from the tumor and its removal. METHODS: An array of electrodes (Med-El ABI) was placed on the dorsal surface of the inferior colliculus in the midbrain of a human volunteer as an auditory prosthesis via an infratentorial supracerebellar median surgical approach. Electrophysiological responses, psychophysical responses, and speech recognition were measured. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation produced auditory sensations on all 12 electrodes with no nonauditory sensations. Auditory threshold levels indicated the stability of the electrode array over time. Electrophysiological measures showed activation in the contralateral auditory cortex but none in ipsilateral cortex. All electrodes demonstrated a full range of loudness sensation and electrode-specific pitch sensations. Speech recognition was significant, but limited in the first month after surgery. CONCLUSION: This approach may provide advantages for patients with brainstem damage.
HYPOTHESIS: Electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus in the midbrain can provide a safe and efficacious alternative to auditory brainstem implants (ABIs). BACKGROUND:Patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) receive limited speech recognition with ABIs. Some ABI patients without NF2 can achieve excellent speech understanding, suggesting that the limited NF2 performance is due to brainstem damage from the tumor and its removal. METHODS: An array of electrodes (Med-El ABI) was placed on the dorsal surface of the inferior colliculus in the midbrain of a human volunteer as an auditory prosthesis via an infratentorial supracerebellar median surgical approach. Electrophysiological responses, psychophysical responses, and speech recognition were measured. RESULTS: Electrical stimulation produced auditory sensations on all 12 electrodes with no nonauditory sensations. Auditory threshold levels indicated the stability of the electrode array over time. Electrophysiological measures showed activation in the contralateral auditory cortex but none in ipsilateral cortex. All electrodes demonstrated a full range of loudness sensation and electrode-specific pitch sensations. Speech recognition was significant, but limited in the first month after surgery. CONCLUSION: This approach may provide advantages for patients with brainstem damage.
Authors: Daniel S Pages; Deborah A Ross; Vanessa M Puñal; Shruti Agashe; Isaac Dweck; Jerel Mueller; Warren M Grill; Blake S Wilson; Jennifer M Groh Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 6.167