OBJECTIVE: Pathogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) bind the self antigen N-terminal domain (domain I) of beta(2)-glycoprotein I (beta(2)GPI), with residues G40-R43 being important. However, peptides homologous to other regions of domain I have also been shown to bind aPL. Furthermore, there are no published reports of the effects of altering R39, which has greater surface exposure than the G40-R43 residues. METHODS: We used a novel, efficient method of production and purification of human domain I by Escherichia coli to create multiple mutants of domain I. These domain I mutants were then screened for binding to a range of polyclonal IgG purified from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, using both solid-phase and fluid-phase assays. RESULTS: E coli-expressed purified domain I selectively bound IgG derived from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. In region R39-R43, the R39S mutation had the greatest effect in terms of reducing binding to a panel of aPL in the fluid phase (mean +/- SD inhibition 14 +/- 18.5% versus 44.1 +/- 31.7% for G40E and 62.9 +/- 25.7% for wild-type domain I). Conversely, altering both D8 and D9 to S8 and G9, respectively, had the effect of enhancing binding to aPL in the fluid phase. Adding the remainder of the domain I-II interlinker resulted in enhanced binding over wild-type in the solid phase but not the fluid phase. CONCLUSION: The binding of aPL to beta(2)GPI domain I is complex and likely to involve discontinuous epitopes that include R39 in addition to G40-R43, the domain I-II interlinker, and possibly D8 and D9. Domain I variants with enhanced binding to aPL compared with wild-type domain I may aid in the development of novel therapies.
OBJECTIVE: Pathogenic antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) bind the self antigen N-terminal domain (domain I) of beta(2)-glycoprotein I (beta(2)GPI), with residues G40-R43 being important. However, peptides homologous to other regions of domain I have also been shown to bind aPL. Furthermore, there are no published reports of the effects of altering R39, which has greater surface exposure than the G40-R43 residues. METHODS: We used a novel, efficient method of production and purification of human domain I by Escherichia coli to create multiple mutants of domain I. These domain I mutants were then screened for binding to a range of polyclonal IgG purified from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome, using both solid-phase and fluid-phase assays. RESULTS: E coli-expressed purified domain I selectively bound IgG derived from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome. In region R39-R43, the R39S mutation had the greatest effect in terms of reducing binding to a panel of aPL in the fluid phase (mean +/- SD inhibition 14 +/- 18.5% versus 44.1 +/- 31.7% for G40E and 62.9 +/- 25.7% for wild-type domain I). Conversely, altering both D8 and D9 to S8 and G9, respectively, had the effect of enhancing binding to aPL in the fluid phase. Adding the remainder of the domain I-II interlinker resulted in enhanced binding over wild-type in the solid phase but not the fluid phase. CONCLUSION: The binding of aPL to beta(2)GPI domain I is complex and likely to involve discontinuous epitopes that include R39 in addition to G40-R43, the domain I-II interlinker, and possibly D8 and D9. Domain I variants with enhanced binding to aPL compared with wild-type domain I may aid in the development of novel therapies.
Authors: Bas de Laat; Ronald H W M Derksen; Menno van Lummel; Maarten T T Pennings; Philip G de Groot Journal: Blood Date: 2005-11-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: S Miyakis; M D Lockshin; T Atsumi; D W Branch; R L Brey; R Cervera; R H W M Derksen; P G DE Groot; T Koike; P L Meroni; G Reber; Y Shoenfeld; A Tincani; P G Vlachoyiannopoulos; S A Krilis Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Tong Shi; Bill Giannakopoulos; Xiaokai Yan; Pei Yu; Michael C Berndt; Robert K Andrews; Juan Rivera; G Michael Iverson; Keith A Cockerill; Matthew D Linnik; Steven A Krilis Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2006-08
Authors: Yiannis Ioannou; Ian Giles; Anastasia Lambrianides; Chris Richardson; Laurence H Pearl; David S Latchman; David A Isenberg; Anisur Rahman Journal: BMC Biotechnol Date: 2006-02-10 Impact factor: 2.563
Authors: William E Ruff; Carina Dehner; Woo J Kim; Odelya Pagovich; Cassyanne L Aguiar; Andrew T Yu; Alexander S Roth; Silvio Manfredo Vieira; Christina Kriegel; Olamide Adeniyi; Melissa J Mulla; Vikki M Abrahams; William W Kwok; Ruth Nussinov; Doruk Erkan; Andrew L Goodman; Martin A Kriegel Journal: Cell Host Microbe Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 21.023
Authors: M Anthony Moody; Hua-Xin Liao; S Munir Alam; Richard M Scearce; M Kelly Plonk; Daniel M Kozink; Mark S Drinker; Ruijun Zhang; Shi-Mao Xia; Laura L Sutherland; Georgia D Tomaras; Ian P Giles; John C Kappes; Christina Ochsenbauer-Jambor; Tara G Edmonds; Melina Soares; Gustavo Barbero; Donald N Forthal; Gary Landucci; Connie Chang; Steven W King; Anita Kavlie; Thomas N Denny; Kwan-Ki Hwang; Pojen P Chen; Philip E Thorpe; David C Montefiori; Barton F Haynes Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2010-04-05 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Douglas B Cines; Keith R McCrae; X Long Zheng; Bruce S Sachais; Eline T Luning Prak; Don L Siegel Journal: Blood Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 22.113