Literature DB >> 17195186

Outcomes after switching from one anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent to a second anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a large UK national cohort study.

Kimme L Hyrich1, Mark Lunt, Kath D Watson, Deborah P M Symmons, Alan J Silman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who experience treatment failure with one anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent, due to either inefficacy or toxicity, are frequently switched to a second anti-TNF agent, although the benefits of switching are unknown. The present study was undertaken to compare drug continuation rates between the first course and second course of anti-TNF therapy.
METHODS: The study involved a prospective cohort of RA patients from a UK national register of new anti-TNF treatment starts (n = 6,739; 876 starting adalimumab, 2,826 starting etanercept, and starting 3,037 infliximab). Over a mean 15 months of followup, 841 patients stopped taking the first drug due to inefficacy and 1,023 stopped the first drug due to toxicity, of whom 503 and 353, respectively, were switched to a second anti-TNF agent. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted to determine continuation rates for each course, and Cox regression was used to compare each course for the risk of stopping and the reason for stopping (inefficacy or toxicity).
RESULTS: Overall, 73% of patients who switched to a second anti-TNF agent remained on the new therapy by the end of followup. First drug discontinuation due to inefficacy was associated with an increased rate of second drug discontinuation due to inefficacy (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.1-3.4) but not toxicity (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.5). Similarly, first drug discontinuation due to toxicity was associated with an increased rate of second drug discontinuation due to toxicity (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.9-2.9) but not inefficacy (HR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.6).
CONCLUSION: RA patients who are switched to a second anti-TNF drug have high rates of continuation, although among those who must discontinue treatment, the reasons for stopping a second drug are related to the reasons for stopping the first drug. This large data set from the UK provides the first estimates of the magnitude of these effects in patients with long-standing severe RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17195186     DOI: 10.1002/art.22331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0004-3591


  123 in total

Review 1.  The advent of biosimilar therapies in rheumatology--"O brave new world".

Authors:  Morton A Scheinberg; Jonathan Kay
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Thresholds in disease activity for switching biologics in rheumatoid arthritis patients: experience from a large U.S. cohort.

Authors:  Jie Zhang; Ying Shan; George Reed; Joel Kremer; Jeffrey D Greenberg; Scott Baumgartner; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 3.  Cost utility of tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: an application of Bayesian methods for evidence synthesis in a Markov model.

Authors:  Christine M Nguyen; Mark Bounthavong; Margaret A S Mendes; Melissa L D Christopher; Josephine N Tran; Rashid Kazerooni; Anthony P Morreale
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Long-term efficacy of infliximab treatment and the predictors of treatment outcomes in patients with refractory uveitis associated with Behçet's disease.

Authors:  Sho Ueda; Mitsuteru Akahoshi; Atsunobu Takeda; Yasushi Inoue; Aya Omoto; Masahiro Ayano; Yasutaka Kimoto; Hiroki Mitoma; Yojiro Arinobu; Hiroaki Niiro; Hiroshi Tsukamoto; Takahiko Horiuchi; Shin-Ichi Hikita; Takako Fukuhara; Tatsuro Ishibashi; Koh-Hei Sonoda; Koichi Akashi
Journal:  Eur J Rheumatol       Date:  2018-03

5.  Switching between anti-tumour necrosis factors: trying to get a handle on a complex issue.

Authors:  Ronald F van Vollenhoven
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Open-label, pilot protocol of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who switch to infliximab after an incomplete response to etanercept: the opposite study.

Authors:  Daniel E Furst; Norman Gaylis; Vance Bray; Ewa Olech; David Yocum; Jeffrey Ritter; Michael Weisman; Daniel J Wallace; John Crues; Dinesh Khanna; Gregory Eckel; Newman Yeilding; Peter Callegari; Sudha Visvanathan; Jeannie Rojas; Ronald Hegedus; Laura George; Khalid Mamun; Keith Gilmer; Orrin Troum
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Cost-effectiveness modeling of abatacept versus other biologic agents in DMARDS and anti-TNF inadequate responders for the management of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Anthony Russell; Ariel Beresniak; Louis Bessette; Boulos Haraoui; Proton Rahman; Carter Thorne; Ross Maclean; Danielle Dupont
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  NICE guidelines on anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy for RA.

Authors:  David L Scott; Sophia Steer
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol       Date:  2008-12-02

9.  Anti-interleukin 6: first line in rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  Luciana Marti; Morton Scheinberg
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Therapy: what should we do after the failure of a first anti-TNF?

Authors:  Chris Deighton
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 20.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.