Literature DB >> 1719471

Effectiveness of developmental intervention in the first five years of life.

F C Bennett1, M J Guralnick.   

Abstract

Developmental intervention in the first 5 years of life is an expanding, complex enterprise. Documenting efficacy by traditional scientific methods has proven to be elusive for a number of practical reasons, e.g., target population heterogeneity, methodology variability, inadequate outcome measures, and cost of longitudinal cohort designs. Nevertheless, despite these shortcomings, there is accumulating research information as to which types of intervention approaches are likely to be most beneficial to specific groups of infants and children and their families. It is quite clear that preventive strategies for at-risk children and families are different than ameliorative strategies for children with established disabilities. It is also clear that comprehensive evaluation of effectiveness must include consideration of both functional child gains (e.g., social, communication, mobility, and adaptive skills) and enhancement of family function. It is the pediatrician's responsibility to be adequately informed about contemporary developmental interventions in order to balance parental hopes and needs with potential benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1719471     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3955(16)38234-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am        ISSN: 0031-3955            Impact factor:   3.278


  10 in total

Review 1.  Screening in child health: studies of the efficacy and relevance of preventive care practices.

Authors:  Peter Weber; Oskar Jenni
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Developmental monitoring in primary care.

Authors:  C E Goldfarb; W Roberts
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  The development of the Toddler Behavior Screening Inventory.

Authors:  P Mouton-Simien; A P McCain; M L Kelley
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  1997-02

4.  Developmental Screening of Refugees: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Abigail L H Kroening; Jessica A Moore; Therese R Welch; Jill S Halterman; Susan L Hyman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Brain research to ameliorate impaired neurodevelopment--home-based intervention trial (BRAIN-HIT).

Authors:  Jan L Wallander; Elizabeth McClure; Fred Biasini; Shivaprasad S Goudar; Omrana Pasha; Elwyn Chomba; Darlene Shearer; Linda Wright; Vanessa Thorsten; Hrishikesh Chakraborty; Sangappa M Dhaded; Niranjana S Mahantshetti; Roopa M Bellad; Zahid Abbasi; Waldemar Carlo
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 2.125

6.  The socioeconomic and biological risk factors for developmental delay in early childhood.

Authors:  Mehpare Ozkan; Saliha Senel; Emel Akbaş Arslan; Can Demir Karacan
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 7.  Should we consider alternatives to universal well-child behavioral-developmental screening?

Authors:  Jacob Urkin; Yair Bar-David; Basil Porter
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  Dose of early intervention treatment during children's first 36 months of life is associated with developmental outcomes: an observational cohort study in three low/low-middle income countries.

Authors:  Jan L Wallander; Fred J Biasini; Vanessa Thorsten; Sangappa M Dhaded; Desiree M de Jong; Elwyn Chomba; Omrana Pasha; Shivaprasad Goudar; Dennis Wallace; Hrishikesh Chakraborty; Linda L Wright; Elizabeth McClure; Waldemar A Carlo
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Worldwide national intervention of developmental screening programs in infant and early childhood.

Authors:  Seunghyo Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Pediatr       Date:  2021-09-30

10.  Can Alberta infant motor scale and milani comparetti motor development screening test be rapid alternatives to bayley scales of infant development-II at high-risk infants.

Authors:  Zeynep Hoşbay Yıldırım; Nur Aydınlı; Barış Ekici; Burak Tatlı; Mine Calişkan
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.383

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.