Literature DB >> 17194239

Relationship between the number of repetitions and selected percentages of one repetition maximum in free weight exercises in trained and untrained men.

Tomoko Shimano1, William J Kraemer, Barry A Spiering, Jeff S Volek, Disa L Hatfield, Ricardo Silvestre, Jakob L Vingren, Maren S Fragala, Carl M Maresh, Steven J Fleck, Robert U Newton, Luuk P B Spreuwenberg, Keijo Häkkinen.   

Abstract

Resistance exercise intensity is commonly prescribed as a percent of 1 repetition maximum (1RM). However, the relationship between percent 1RM and the number of repetitions allowed remains poorly studied, especially using free weight exercises. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximal number of repetitions that trained (T) and untrained (UT) men can perform during free weight exercises at various percentages of 1RM. Eight T and 8 UT men were tested for 1RM strength. Then, subjects performed 1 set to failure at 60, 80, and 90% of 1RM in the back squat, bench press, and arm curl in a randomized, balanced design. There was a significant (p < 0.05) intensity x exercise interaction. More repetitions were performed during the back squat than the bench press or arm curl at 60% 1RM for T and UT. At 80 and 90% 1RM, there were significant differences between the back squat and other exercises; however, differences were much less pronounced. No differences in number of repetitions performed at a given exercise intensity were noted between T and UT (except during bench press at 90% 1RM). In conclusion, the number of repetitions performed at a given percent of 1RM is influenced by the amount of muscle mass used during the exercise, as more repetitions can be performed during the back squat than either the bench press or arm curl. Training status of the individual has a minimal impact on the number of repetitions performed at relative exercise intensity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17194239     DOI: 10.1519/R-18195.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  56 in total

1.  Congruency and responsiveness of perceived exertion and time-to-end-point during an intermittent isometric fatigue task.

Authors:  Joseph Shepherd; Nigel Gleeson; Claire Minshull
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Attempting to better define "intensity" for muscular performance: is it all wasted effort?

Authors:  J Fisher; D Smith
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of load magnitude on muscular activity and tissue oxygenation during repeated elbow flexions until failure.

Authors:  Stéphane Baudry; Sébastien Sarrazin; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  High- and Low-Load Resistance Training: Interpretation and Practical Application of Current Research Findings.

Authors:  James Fisher; James Steele; Dave Smith
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Resistance exercise at variable volume does not reduce postprandial lipemia in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Cleiton Silva Correa; Bruno Costa Teixeira; Rodrigo Cauduro Oliveira Macedo; Aline Bittencourt; Renata Lopes Kruger; Julia Silveira Gross; Ronei Silveira Pinto; Alvaro Reischak-Oliveira
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-01-12

6.  Selective effects of different fatigue protocols on the function of upper body muscles assessed through the force-velocity relationship.

Authors:  Amador García-Ramos; Alejandro Torrejón; Belén Feriche; Antonio J Morales-Artacho; Alejandro Pérez-Castilla; Paulino Padial; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Effect of a rest-pause vs. traditional squat on electromyography and lifting volume in trained women.

Authors:  John A Korak; Max R Paquette; Dana K Fuller; Jennifer L Caputo; John M Coons
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  Rating of Perceived Effort: Methodological Concerns and Future Directions.

Authors:  Israel Halperin; Aviv Emanuel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Relationship between the rating of perceived exertion scale and the load intensity of resistance training.

Authors:  Shinichiro Morishita; Atsuhiro Tsubaki; Tomoya Takabayashi; Jack B Fu
Journal:  Strength Cond J       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Low and moderate, rather than high intensity strength exercise induces benefit regarding plasma lipid profile.

Authors:  Fabio S Lira; Alex S Yamashita; Marco C Uchida; Nelo E Zanchi; Bruno Gualano; Eivor Martins; Erico C Caperuto; Marília Seelaender
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.320

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.