Literature DB >> 17192434

An oculomotor decision process revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Stephen J Heinen1, Jess Rowland, Byeong-Taek Lee, Alex R Wade.   

Abstract

It is not known how the brain decides to act on moving objects. We demonstrated previously that neurons in the macaque supplementary eye field (SEF) reflect the rule of ocular baseball, a go/nogo task in which eye movements signal the rule-guided interpretation of the trajectory of a target. In ocular baseball, subjects must decide whether to pursue a moving spot target with an eye movement after discriminating whether the target will cross a distal, visible line segment. Here we identify cortical regions active during the ocular baseball task using event-related human functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and concurrent eye-movement monitoring. Task-related activity was observed in the SEF, the frontal eye field (FEF), the superior parietal lobule (SPL), and the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). The SPL and right VLPFC showed heightened activity only during ocular baseball, despite identical stimuli and oculomotor demands in the control task, implicating these areas in the decision process. Furthermore, the right VLPFC but not the SPL showed the greatest activation during the nogo decision trials. This suggests both a functional dissociation between these areas and a role for the right VLPFC in rule-guided inhibition of behavior. In the SEF and FEF, activity was similar for ocular baseball and a control eye-movement task. We propose that, although the SEF reflects the ocular baseball rule, both areas in humans are functionally closer to motor processing than the SPL and the right VLPFC. By recording population activity with fMRI during the ocular baseball task, we have revealed the cortical substrate of an oculomotor decision process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17192434      PMCID: PMC6674715          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4243-06.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  13 in total

1.  Supplementary eye field activity reflects a decision rule governing smooth pursuit but not the decision.

Authors:  Shun-nan Yang; Helen Hwang; Joel Ford; Stephen Heinen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Flexible interpretation of a decision rule by supplementary eye field neurons.

Authors:  S J Heinen; H Hwang; S N Yang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Smooth pursuit preparation modulates neuronal responses in visual areas MT and MST.

Authors:  Vincent P Ferrera
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Contrasting the roles of the supplementary and frontal eye fields in ocular decision making.

Authors:  Shun-Nan Yang; Stephen Heinen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Eye movements as a readout of sensorimotor decision processes.

Authors:  Jolande Fooken; Miriam Spering
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Sensorimotor-independent prefrontal activity during response inhibition.

Authors:  Weidong Cai; Christopher J Cannistraci; John C Gore; Hoi-Chung Leung
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Rapid-response impulsivity: definitions, measurement issues, and clinical implications.

Authors:  Kristen R Hamilton; Andrew K Littlefield; Noelle C Anastasio; Kathryn A Cunningham; Latham H L Fink; Victoria C Wing; Charles W Mathias; Scott D Lane; Christian G Schütz; Alan C Swann; C W Lejuez; Luke Clark; F Gerard Moeller; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Personal Disord       Date:  2015-04

Review 8.  From reactive to proactive and selective control: developing a richer model for stopping inappropriate responses.

Authors:  Adam R Aron
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Gaze-Direction-Based MEG Averaging During Audiovisual Speech Perception.

Authors:  Lotta Hirvenkari; Veikko Jousmäki; Satu Lamminmäki; Veli-Matti Saarinen; Mikko E Sams; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Saccade suppression exerts global effects on the motor system.

Authors:  Jan R Wessel; H Sequoyah Reynoso; Adam R Aron
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.