Literature DB >> 17192332

Lack of effect of guideline changes on hypertension control for patients with diabetes in the U.S., 1995-2005.

Y Richard Wang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of new Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC) guidelines on hypertension control for patients with diabetes in the U.S. using patients without diabetes as the control group for the time trend. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The JNC VI and VII guidelines, published in 1997 and 2003, set more aggressive goal blood pressure for patients with diabetes. Data from the National Disease and Therapeutic Index, a nationally representative survey of outpatient visits in the U.S., was used to compare the difference in hypertension control (blood pressure <140/90 mmHg) between diabetic and nondiabetic visits during 1995-2005.
RESULTS: Hypertension control improved for both diabetic and nondiabetic visits in the study period. Compared with nondiabetic visits, there was no change in hypertension control for diabetic visits before 2001 and an approximately 4% increase afterward (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The publication of new JNC guidelines did not result in substantially better hypertension control for patients with diabetes in the U.S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17192332     DOI: 10.2337/dc06-1573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  3 in total

1.  Generic medications and blood pressure control in diabetic hypertensive subjects: results from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

Authors:  Doyle M Cummings; Abraham J Letter; George Howard; Virginia J Howard; Monika M Safford; Valerie Prince; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Blood pressure control in diabetes: temporal progress yet persistent racial disparities: national results from the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.

Authors:  Doyle M Cummings; Lisa Doherty; George Howard; Virginia J Howard; Monika M Safford; Valerie Prince; Brett Kissela; Daniel T Lackland
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 17.152

3.  Quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care in Norway is improving: results of cross-sectional surveys of 33 general practices in 1995 and 2005.

Authors:  John Graham Cooper; Tor Claudi; Anne Karen Jenum; Geir Thue; Marie Fjelde Hausken; Wibeche Ingskog; Sverre Sandberg
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 17.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.