Literature DB >> 17192299

Clinical significance of the parental origin of the X chromosome in turner syndrome.

Liora Sagi1, Nehama Zuckerman-Levin, Aneta Gawlik, Lucia Ghizzoni, Atilla Buyukgebiz, Yardena Rakover, Tzvi Bistritzer, Osnat Admoni, Alessandra Vottero, Oshrat Baruch, Fuad Fares, Ewa Malecka-Tendera, Ze'ev Hochberg.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The phenotype in Turner syndrome (TS) is variable, even in patients with a supposedly nonmosaic karyotype. Previous work suggested that there were X-linked parent-of-origin effects on the phenotype. HYPOTHESIS: The TS phenotype is influenced by the parental origin of the missed X chromosome.
DESIGN: This was a multicenter prospective study of TS patients and both their parents, determining parental origin of the X-chromosome, and characterizing the clinical phenotype. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-three TS patients and their parents were studied. Inclusion criteria were TS with karyotype 45,X or 46Xi(Xq). Four highly polymorphic microsatellite markers on the X-chromosome DMD49, DYSII, DXS1283, and the androgen receptor gene and three Y chromosome markers, SRY, DYZ1, and DYZ3. OUTCOME MEASURES: The study determined the correlation between the parental origin of the X chromosome and the unique phenotypic traits of TS including congenital malformations, anthropometry and growth pattern, skeletal defects, endocrine traits, education, and vocation.
RESULTS: Eighty-three percent of 45,X retained their maternal X (X(m)), whereas 64% 46Xi(Xq) retained their paternal X (X(p), P < 0.001). Kidney malformations were exclusively found in X(m) patients (P = 0.030). The X(m) group had lower total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P < 0.003), and higher body mass index sd score (P = 0.030) that was not maintained after GH treatment. Response to GH therapy was comparable. Ocular abnormalities were more common in the paternal X group (P = 0.017), who also had higher academic achievement.
CONCLUSIONS: The parental origin of the missing short arm of the X chromosome has an impact on overweight, kidney, eye, and lipids, which suggests a potential effect of an as-yet-undetermined X chromosome gene imprinting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17192299     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-0158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  26 in total

1.  Evaluation of function and structure of arterial wall in girls and young women with Turner syndrome.

Authors:  G Radetti; L Mazzanti; C Di Somma; M Salerno; E Gottardi; D Capalbo; F Tamburrino; A Colao
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 2.  Child health, developmental plasticity, and epigenetic programming.

Authors:  Z Hochberg; R Feil; M Constancia; M Fraga; C Junien; J-C Carel; P Boileau; Y Le Bouc; C L Deal; K Lillycrop; R Scharfmann; A Sheppard; M Skinner; M Szyf; R A Waterland; D J Waxman; E Whitelaw; K Ong; K Albertsson-Wikland
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 19.871

3.  Genomic imprinting effects of the X chromosome on brain morphology.

Authors:  Jean-Francois Lepage; David S Hong; Paul K Mazaika; Mira Raman; Kristen Sheau; Matthew J Marzelli; Joachim Hallmayer; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  X chromosome parental origin and aortic stiffness in turner syndrome.

Authors:  Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem; Vladimir K Bakalov; Jatin R Matta; Nancy Muldoon; John A Hanover; Carolyn A Bondy; Ahmed M Gharib
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.478

5.  Genomic imprinting effects on cognitive and social abilities in prepubertal girls with Turner syndrome.

Authors:  Jean-François Lepage; David S Hong; Joachim Hallmayer; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.958

6.  Turner Syndrome Genotype and phenotype and their effect on presenting features and timing of Diagnosis.

Authors:  I Al Alwan; Khadora M; Nasrat G; Omair A; Brown L; Al Dubayee M; Badri M
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2014-04

7.  Insulin resistance in adolescents with Turner syndrome is comparable to obese peers, but the overall metabolic risk is lower due to unknown mechanism.

Authors:  M Wojcik; D Janus; A Zygmunt-Gorska; J B Starzyk
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.256

8.  Effects of X Chromosome Monosomy and Genomic Imprinting on Observational Markers of Social Anxiety in Prepubertal Girls with Turner Syndrome.

Authors:  Scott S Hall; Matthew J Riley; Robyn N Weston; Jean-Francois Lepage; David S Hong; Booil Jo; Joachim Hallmayer; Allan L Reiss
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-03-09

9.  Haplotype analysis of the X chromosome in patients with Turner syndrome in order to verify the possible effect of imprinting on selected symptoms.

Authors:  Petr Vrtel; Radek Vrtel; Eva Klaskova; Dita Vrbicka; Katerina Adamova; Jan Pavlicek; Vaclav Hana; Vaclav Hana; Ondrej Soucek; Veronika Stara; Jan Lebl; Marta Snajdrova; Jirina Zapletalova; Tomas Furst; Sabina Kapralova; Zdenek Tauber; Eva Krejcirikova; Marketa Routilova; Julia Stellmachova; Radek Vodicka; Martin Prochazka
Journal:  Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 1.245

10.  Sex dependent imprinting effects on complex traits in mice.

Authors:  Reinmar Hager; James M Cheverud; Larry J Leamy; Jason B Wolf
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.