Literature DB >> 17191754

Effects of D-amphetamine and ethanol on variable and repetitive key-peck sequences in pigeons.

Ryan D Ward1, Ericka M Bailey, Amy L Odum.   

Abstract

This experiment assessed the effects of d-amphetamine and ethanol on reinforced variable and repetitive key-peck sequences in pigeons. Pigeons responded on two keys under a multiple schedule of Repeat and Vary components. In the Repeat component, completion of a target sequence of right, right, left, left resulted in food. In the Vary component, 4-peck sequences differing from the previous 10 produced food. d-Amphetamine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.m.) was administered in two separate phases, separated by ethanol administration (1.0-2.0 g/kg, i.g.). Under control conditions, measures of variability were high in the Vary component, and lower in the Repeat component. Following administration of the highest dose of d-amphetamine, but not ethanol, response rates decreased in both components. d-Amphetamine and ethanol tended to increase overall sequence variability in the Repeat component, and had less of an effect in the Vary component. Performance in the Repeat component during Phase 2 of d-amphetamine administration was more disrupted than during Phase 1. Measures of variability and repetition based on shifts in the relative frequency distributions of the 16 possible keypeck sequences differed from those based on the overall measure of variability, highlighting the importance of considering both molar and molecular measures when assessing the effects of drugs on reinforced variability and repetition. In addition, the shifts in the relative frequency distribution of response sequences suggest that d-amphetamine produced decrements in repeat performance by decreasing discriminative control within response sequences, whereas ethanol decreased repeat performance by decreasing discriminability between components as well as discriminative control within response sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17191754      PMCID: PMC1679968          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2006.17-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  27 in total

1.  Stability and variability in extinction.

Authors:  A Neuringer; N Kornell; M Olufs
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2001-01

2.  Sensitization to cocaine in pigeons: interaction with an operant contingency.

Authors:  Jonathan W Pinkston; Marc N Branch
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.157

3.  Statistical behavioristics and sequences of responses.

Authors:  G A MILLER; F C FRICK
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1949-11       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Effects of ethanol on reinforced variations and repetitions by rats under a multiple schedule.

Authors:  L Cohen; A Neuringer; D Rhodes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Signal detection analysis of ethanol effects on a complex conditional discrimination.

Authors:  K F Melia; C L Ehlers
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Stereotyped activities produced by amphetamine in several animal species and man.

Authors:  A Randrup; I Munkvad
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1967

7.  The dose-response effect of amphetamine upon avoidance behaviour in the rat seen as a function of increasing stereotypy.

Authors:  M Lyon; A Randrup
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1972

8.  The reinforcement of least-frequent interresponse times.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Low doses of ethanol impair spatial working memory and reduce hippocampal theta activity.

Authors:  B Givens
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Different effects of amphetamine on reinforced variations versus repetitions in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).

Authors:  D M Mook; A Neuringer
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1994-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  History effects on induced and operant variability.

Authors:  Alessandra da Silva Souza; Josele Abreu-Rodrigues; Ana Amélia Baumann
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Varied but not necessarily random: human performance under variability contingencies is affected by instructions.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Thaissa Neves R Pontes; Josele Abreu-Rodrigues
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Punishment-induced behavioral and neurophysiological variability reveals dopamine-dependent selection of kinematic movement parameters.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Diane Ruge; Arthur Buijink; Sven Bestmann; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Limitations to the generality of cocaine locomotor sensitization.

Authors:  Julie A Marusich; Marc N Branch; Jesse Dallery
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  An investigation of resurgence of reinforced behavioral variability in humans.

Authors:  Ann Galizio; Jonathan E Friedel; Amy L Odum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.215

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.