Literature DB >> 17191235

A new quantitative analysis system for the evaluation of coronary bifurcation lesions: comparison with current conventional methods.

Omer Goktekin1, Sahin Kaplan, Konstantinos Dimopoulos, Peter Barlis, Jun Tanigawa, Mehmet Akif Vatankulu, Gerhard Koning, Joan C Tuinenburg, Carlo Di Mario.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Objective conventional quantitative angiographic systems are designed to automatically follow the contours of straight vascular segments and not of bifurcations. Recently a new analysis method was specifically developed for bifurcation lesions, able to automatically divide the lesion into three separate segments. In this study, we aimed to assess whether the smaller interaction required by the analyst could reduce the analysis time and inter and intra observer variability when compared with a conventional analysis.
METHOD: We used a dedicated system (QVA-CMS V. 6.0 with the Bifurcation Module, MEDIS, Leiden, The Netherlands) applying a minimum cost algorithm tuned to detect the contours of the proximal main vessel (PMV), distal main vessel (DMV), and side-branch (SB). We assessed the intra- and the interobserver agreement in measurements of minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and percentage diameter stenosis (%DS) of the PMV and DMV, as well as of the SB ostium in 30 angiograms of patients before and after percutaneous coronary angioplasty with stenting of both branches. The consensus between measurements by two observers and by the same observer was analyzed using the intra- and interclass correlation coefficient and the reliability coefficients for all measurements. Bland-Altman plots before and after PCI were also generated to assess the relationship between variability and absolute measurements.
RESULTS: Before PCI, intra- and interobserver variabilities were consistently lower for the new QVA system, with a significant difference for lesion length in the SB. Post-PCI data showed a greater variability in the assessment of diameter stenosis with both techniques. The time for analysis was significantly lower both before and after PCI for QVA compared with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) (4.7 +/- 1.1 min versus 6.2 +/- 1.3 min, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that this new quantitative bifurcation analysis system can be consistently applied to the analysis of bifurcation lesions before and after angioplasty, with an intra- and interobserver reproducibility equal to or better than the conventional analysis system with a significantly shorter analysis time. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17191235     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20946

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  5 in total

1.  Quantitative coronary analysis in the Nordic Bifurcation studies.

Authors:  Niels R Holm; Helle Højdahl; Jens F Lassen; Leif Thuesen; Michael Maeng
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Impact of the bifurcation angle on major cardiac events after cross-over single stent strategy in unprotected left main bifurcation lesions: 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis.

Authors:  Kisaki Amemiya; Takenori Domei; Masashi Iwabuchi; Shinichi Shirai; Kenji Ando; Masahiko Goya; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Masakiyo Nobuyoshi
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-12-29

3.  Fusion of 3D QCA and IVUS/OCT.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Niels R Holm; Gerhard Koning; Zheng Huang; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Assessment of obstruction length and optimal viewing angle from biplane X-ray angiograms.

Authors:  Shengxian Tu; Gerhard Koning; Wouter Jukema; Johan H C Reiber
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Acute and long-term angiographic outcomes of side branch stenosis after randomized treatment of zotarolimus-, sirolimus-, and paclitaxel-eluting stent for coronary artery stenosis.

Authors:  Bong-Ki Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Duk-Woo Park; Sung-Cheol Yun; Jung-Min Ahn; Hae Geun Song; Jong-Young Lee; Won-Jang Kim; Soo-Jin Kang; Seung-Whan Lee; Cheol Whan Lee; Jae-Hwan Lee; In-Whan Seong; Seong-Wook Park; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.153

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.