Literature DB >> 17190710

Self-awareness of impairment and the decision to drive after an extended period of wakefulness.

Christopher B Jones1, Jillian Dorrian, Sarah M Jay, Nicole Lamond, Sally Ferguson, Drew Dawson.   

Abstract

Fatigue is an increasingly noted factor in road accidents. The ability to predict and be aware of impairment in terms of driving capability is important for potential legal liability and road safety. However, to date, there have been few studies that have investigated the accuracy of individuals in predicting how safely they could drive during conditions of sleep loss. Research has demonstrated that individuals rate themselves as better than the population average in a number of domains, including driving-related skills. Therefore, this study also aimed to investigate self-ratings of predicted driving ability during extended wakefulness and compare them to ratings made of a hypothetical other person under the same conditions. Thirty-two participants remained awake for a period of 40 h. Every 2 h, they completed the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) and rated on a seven-point scale how well they thought they could drive safely, react quickly in an emergency, and stay in their own lane. They were also asked to assess how they thought someone else in their own position could drive. The participants rated their driving ability as becoming significantly poorer at the same time that their PVT performance became significantly slower. Self-ratings indicating a qualitative assessment of poorer than neutral driving occurred at 03:00 h for both the "drive safely" and "react quickly" questions, after 19 h of continuous wakefulness (starting at 08:00 h). This occurred at 05:00 h for the "keep in my lane" question. Previous studies with a similar protocol demonstrated that under these conditions, individuals exhibit a performance decrements equivalent to someone with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.05% (the legal driving limit in Australia). Participants consistently rated the ability of others to drive as poorer than their own. The main implication from this study for road safety and legal liability is that it is reasonable to focus on a person's perception of the situation, as it does align with objective reality to a certain extent. A concern in terms of road safety is potential overconfidence, indicated by rating others consistently poorer than themselves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17190710     DOI: 10.1080/07420520601083391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chronobiol Int        ISSN: 0742-0528            Impact factor:   2.877


  4 in total

1.  A case-crossover study of sleep and work hours and the risk of road traffic accidents.

Authors:  Francesca Valent; Stefano Di Bartolomeo; Riccardo Marchetti; Rodolfo Sbrojavacca; Fabio Barbone
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Drowsiness/alertness algorithm development and validation using synchronized EEG and cognitive performance to individualize a generalized model.

Authors:  Robin R Johnson; Djordje P Popovic; Richard E Olmstead; Maja Stikic; Daniel J Levendowski; Chris Berka
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  Effects of total sleep deprivation on the perception of action capabilities.

Authors:  Yannick Daviaux; Jean-Baptiste Mignardot; Christophe Cornu; Thibault Deschamps
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Sleep and Organizational Behavior: Implications for Workplace Productivity and Safety.

Authors:  June J Pilcher; Drew M Morris
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-01-31
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.