Frank F Eves1, Oliver J Webb, Nanette Mutrie. 1. School of Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. F.F.Eves@bham.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Stair climbing is a lifestyle physical activity that uses more calories per minute than jogging. This study tested an intervention designed to promote stair climbing in a workplace. Because previous studies provide only equivocal evidence of the effects of increased stair climbing in worksites, a formal comparison of the effects of the intervention on stair ascent and descent was made. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: In a five-story public sector building, a 2-week baseline was followed by 6 weeks of an intervention involving a 23(1/2)- x 16(1/2)-inch poster in the lobby, the same poster and six messages affixed to the stair risers between floors, and an 11(3/4)- x 8(1/4)-inch point-of-choice prompt at the elevators. Stair and elevator choices (n = 26,806) were videotaped throughout and subsequently coded for direction of travel, traveler's sex, and traveler's load. Weight status was coded using silhouettes beside the computer monitor. RESULTS: A significant effect of the intervention on stair climbing was greater in those coded as overweight (+5.4%; odds ratio = 1.33) than in individuals of normal weight (+2.5%; odds ratio = 1.12). Although stair descent was more common than ascent, the intervention had similar effects for both directions of travel. DISCUSSION: Stair climbing at work has few barriers and seems to be a type of physical activity that is acceptable to overweight individuals. The relatively weak effect of workplace interventions compared with results for public access staircases may reflect uncontrolled effects such as the immediate availability of the elevator for the traveler.
OBJECTIVE: Stair climbing is a lifestyle physical activity that uses more calories per minute than jogging. This study tested an intervention designed to promote stair climbing in a workplace. Because previous studies provide only equivocal evidence of the effects of increased stair climbing in worksites, a formal comparison of the effects of the intervention on stair ascent and descent was made. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: In a five-story public sector building, a 2-week baseline was followed by 6 weeks of an intervention involving a 23(1/2)- x 16(1/2)-inch poster in the lobby, the same poster and six messages affixed to the stair risers between floors, and an 11(3/4)- x 8(1/4)-inch point-of-choice prompt at the elevators. Stair and elevator choices (n = 26,806) were videotaped throughout and subsequently coded for direction of travel, traveler's sex, and traveler's load. Weight status was coded using silhouettes beside the computer monitor. RESULTS: A significant effect of the intervention on stair climbing was greater in those coded as overweight (+5.4%; odds ratio = 1.33) than in individuals of normal weight (+2.5%; odds ratio = 1.12). Although stair descent was more common than ascent, the intervention had similar effects for both directions of travel. DISCUSSION: Stair climbing at work has few barriers and seems to be a type of physical activity that is acceptable to overweight individuals. The relatively weak effect of workplace interventions compared with results for public access staircases may reflect uncontrolled effects such as the immediate availability of the elevator for the traveler.
Authors: Ross Arena; Marco Guazzi; Paige D Briggs; Lawrence P Cahalin; Jonathan Myers; Leonard A Kaminsky; Daniel E Forman; Gerson Cipriano; Audrey Borghi-Silva; Abraham Samuel Babu; Carl J Lavie Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Anna C Whittaker; Frank F Eves; Douglas Carroll; Tessa J Roseboom; Annie T Ginty; Rebecca C Painter; Susanne R de Rooij Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Falk Müller-Riemenschneider; Marc Nocon; Thomas Reinhold; Stefan N Willich Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-08-04 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Karen Villanueva; Matthew Knuiman; Mohammad Javad Koohsari; Sharyn Hickey; Sarah Foster; Hannah Badland; Andrea Nathan; Fiona Bull; Billie Giles-Corti Journal: Int J Health Geogr Date: 2013-12-21 Impact factor: 3.918