OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and efficiency of an initiation protocol for non-invasive home mechanical ventilation (NIHMV) carried out at a pulmonary outpatient clinic with the standard in-hospital model. METHODS: Prospective, observational study. POPULATION: 16 patients divided into two groups: (A) outpatient protocol (n=9); and (B) standard in-hospital initiation with an elective admission (n=7). INSTRUMENTATION: at baseline condition and treatment starting, arterial blood gases and nocturnal pulse-oximetry were performed. At the end of follow-up, arterial blood gases and patient compliance (ventilator's built-in counter) was determined. Efficiency was evaluated by calculating cost savings per ventilated patient for the financier and accumulated days of hospitalization saved. RESULTS: No differences in baseline conditions were observed. Ventilation was effective in the two groups: a significant decrease in PaCO(2) and an increase in mean nocturnal oxygen saturation were observed after initiating ventilation. (Group A: PaCO(2):42.9+/-1.5; SpO(2):91.9+/-1.9; Group B:PaCO(2):44.3+/-6; SpO(2):91.9+/-2.7). At three months the effectiveness of ventilation and the number of hours of ventilation was equivalent in all groups. The new model cut costs for the health care financier by 50%. The outpatient sessions saved 63 days of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Outpatient initiation is an effective and efficient alternative to the traditional in-hospital method for NIHMV. (2) The outpatient protocol represents a substantial saving for the financier.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and efficiency of an initiation protocol for non-invasive home mechanical ventilation (NIHMV) carried out at a pulmonary outpatient clinic with the standard in-hospital model. METHODS: Prospective, observational study. POPULATION: 16 patients divided into two groups: (A) outpatient protocol (n=9); and (B) standard in-hospital initiation with an elective admission (n=7). INSTRUMENTATION: at baseline condition and treatment starting, arterial blood gases and nocturnal pulse-oximetry were performed. At the end of follow-up, arterial blood gases and patient compliance (ventilator's built-in counter) was determined. Efficiency was evaluated by calculating cost savings per ventilated patient for the financier and accumulated days of hospitalization saved. RESULTS: No differences in baseline conditions were observed. Ventilation was effective in the two groups: a significant decrease in PaCO(2) and an increase in mean nocturnal oxygen saturation were observed after initiating ventilation. (Group A: PaCO(2):42.9+/-1.5; SpO(2):91.9+/-1.9; Group B:PaCO(2):44.3+/-6; SpO(2):91.9+/-2.7). At three months the effectiveness of ventilation and the number of hours of ventilation was equivalent in all groups. The new model cut costs for the health care financier by 50%. The outpatient sessions saved 63 days of hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Outpatient initiation is an effective and efficient alternative to the traditional in-hospital method for NIHMV. (2) The outpatient protocol represents a substantial saving for the financier.
Authors: Eliezer Be'eri; Simon Owen; Maurit Beeri; Scott R Millis; Arik Eisenkraft Journal: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 1.385