AIM: To investigate whether aspirin resistance is a persistent condition, and to evaluate if aspirin resistance affects one-year clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Previously we studied 298 patients admitted to hospital with symptoms suggestive of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) despite treatment with aspirin, and 70 patients (23.5%) were aspirin resistant. In the present study, platelet function was reassessed by use of a Platelet Function Analyzer-100 one year later. A total of 187 patients were re-examined, and 17 (9.1%) demonstrated aspirin resistance. Of these 17 patients, 12 also exhibited aspirin resistance at baseline resulting in a 6% (12/187) prevalence of persistent aspirin resistance. A total of 34 patients had changed from aspirin resistant at baseline to aspirin sensitive at follow-up. We found a significant decrease in the prevalence of aspirin resistance from baseline (43%) to follow-up (11%) in patients with MI at baseline (p=0.0018). Furthermore, a significant decrease was found for patients without MI at baseline (20% to 9%, p=0.0009). During follow-up, 17% (12/70) of the patients with aspirin resistance at baseline suffered death, MI or stroke compared to 16% (37/227) of aspirin sensitive patients (p=0.868). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of aspirin resistance varies with the clinical status of the patients, and indeed an acute MI is associated with temporary aspirin resistance. We also found that 6% of patients demonstrate persistent aspirin resistance. The presence of aspirin resistance did not affect one-year clinical outcome.
AIM: To investigate whether aspirin resistance is a persistent condition, and to evaluate if aspirin resistance affects one-year clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Previously we studied 298 patients admitted to hospital with symptoms suggestive of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) despite treatment with aspirin, and 70 patients (23.5%) were aspirin resistant. In the present study, platelet function was reassessed by use of a Platelet Function Analyzer-100 one year later. A total of 187 patients were re-examined, and 17 (9.1%) demonstrated aspirin resistance. Of these 17 patients, 12 also exhibited aspirin resistance at baseline resulting in a 6% (12/187) prevalence of persistent aspirin resistance. A total of 34 patients had changed from aspirin resistant at baseline to aspirin sensitive at follow-up. We found a significant decrease in the prevalence of aspirin resistance from baseline (43%) to follow-up (11%) in patients with MI at baseline (p=0.0018). Furthermore, a significant decrease was found for patients without MI at baseline (20% to 9%, p=0.0009). During follow-up, 17% (12/70) of the patients with aspirin resistance at baseline suffered death, MI or stroke compared to 16% (37/227) of aspirin sensitive patients (p=0.868). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of aspirin resistance varies with the clinical status of the patients, and indeed an acute MI is associated with temporary aspirin resistance. We also found that 6% of patients demonstrate persistent aspirin resistance. The presence of aspirin resistance did not affect one-year clinical outcome.
Authors: Jan Hartinger; Robert Novotny; Jana Bilkova; Tomas Kvasnicka; Petr Mitas; Martin Sima; Jaroslav Hlubocky; Jan Kvasnicka; Ondrej Slanar; Jaroslav Lindner Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2018-05-13 Impact factor: 1.927