BACKGROUND: Common guidelines for intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) interpretation are based on clearly elevated baseline parathyroid hormone (PTH) values. We hypothesize that patients with low-baseline levels (<100 pg/mL) have a higher incidence of multigland disease (MGD) and display differences in PTH kinetics compared with patients with high-baseline levels. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 1151 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy with IOPTH monitoring. Of these, 141 patients had low-baseline values. Multiple comparisons were made between the low-baseline and high-baseline groups. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of the low-baseline patients had MGD versus 15% of the high-baseline patients (P = .002). The PTH kinetics differed between groups after gland excision at both 5 and 10 minutes. Adherence solely to the "50% rule" during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy potentially would have missed 25% of patients with MGD in the low-baseline group versus 10% in the high-baseline group; 5.7% of the low-baseline patients had persistent or recurrent hypercalcemia versus 2.9% of the high-baseline patients. CONCLUSION: MGD is significantly more prevalent among low-baseline patients, and PTH kinetics are somewhat different between groups. The current guidelines that are used for IOPTH monitoring may not be ideal for use in this low-baseline group and will likely need to be revised after further study of this group of patients.
BACKGROUND: Common guidelines for intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) interpretation are based on clearly elevated baseline parathyroid hormone (PTH) values. We hypothesize that patients with low-baseline levels (<100 pg/mL) have a higher incidence of multigland disease (MGD) and display differences in PTH kinetics compared with patients with high-baseline levels. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of 1151 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism who underwent parathyroidectomy with IOPTH monitoring. Of these, 141 patients had low-baseline values. Multiple comparisons were made between the low-baseline and high-baseline groups. RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of the low-baseline patients had MGD versus 15% of the high-baseline patients (P = .002). The PTH kinetics differed between groups after gland excision at both 5 and 10 minutes. Adherence solely to the "50% rule" during minimally invasive parathyroidectomy potentially would have missed 25% of patients with MGD in the low-baseline group versus 10% in the high-baseline group; 5.7% of the low-baseline patients had persistent or recurrent hypercalcemia versus 2.9% of the high-baseline patients. CONCLUSION: MGD is significantly more prevalent among low-baseline patients, and PTH kinetics are somewhat different between groups. The current guidelines that are used for IOPTH monitoring may not be ideal for use in this low-baseline group and will likely need to be revised after further study of this group of patients.
Authors: Laura I Wharry; Linwah Yip; Michaele J Armstrong; Mohamed A Virji; Michael T Stang; Sally E Carty; Kelly L McCoy Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Philipp Riss; Christoph Krall; Christian Scheuba; Christian Bieglmayer; Bruno Niederle Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2013-07-05 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: T Weber; C Dotzenrath; H Dralle; B Niederle; P Riss; K Holzer; J Kußmann; A Trupka; T Negele; R Kaderli; E Karakas; F Weber; N Rayes; A Zielke; M Hermann; C Wicke; R Ladurner; C Vorländer; J Waldmann; O Heizmann; S Wächter; S Schopf; W Timmermann; D K Bartsch; R Schmidmaier; M Luster; K W Schmid; M Ketteler; C Dierks; P Schabram; T Steinmüller; K Lorenz Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: Philipp Riss; Reza Asari; Christian Scheuba; Christian Bieglmayer; Bruno Niederle Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2009-04-25 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: David F Schneider; Kristin A Ojomo; Haggi Mazeh; Sarah C Oltmann; Rebecca S Sippel; Herbert Chen Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 2.192