BACKGROUND: In the Medicare population, end-of-life care is fragmented and hospice is underutilized. Evidence suggests that hospice care is associated with increased patient/family satisfaction and reductions in overall health care costs. Advanced Illness Management (AIM) is a home-based program established to ease the transition between curative and comfort care for seriously ill patients who lack coordinated hospital, home health, and hospice care. OBJECTIVE: Measure the impact of the AIM program on the discharge disposition of participating home health patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: A total of 435 patients who received home health services through the Sutter Visiting Nurse Association and Hospice (SVNA&H) and who were discharged between 2003 and September 2005 were included in this study. Participants were selected based on a life expectancy of 6 months or less and additionally matched on prognosis of current episode of illness and symptom status. Intervention patients were compared to those receiving usual home health care at two SVNA&H branches. RESULTS: In the within-branch comparison, a 28% difference was observed in the number of hospice referrals between patients who received the AIM intervention and Usual Care I (47% AIM; 33% UCI, p = 0.003). When patients receiving the AIM intervention were compared to patients from another branch, Usual Care II, a 67% difference emerged (47% AIM; 16% UCII, p < 0.0001). Among African American patients, 60% and 73% more patients were referred to hospice when AIM patients were compared to Usual Care I and Usual Care II patients, respectively (p < 0.01). These differences persisted after controlling for symptom status, patient demographics and home health length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The AIM program was successful at increasing hospice utilization through a targeted intervention focused on palliative and end-of-life care, increased patient education and decision making, and a dynamic treatment approach. The finding of increased utilization by African Americans, a population traditionally reluctant to use hospice, was particularly noteworthy.
BACKGROUND: In the Medicare population, end-of-life care is fragmented and hospice is underutilized. Evidence suggests that hospice care is associated with increased patient/family satisfaction and reductions in overall health care costs. Advanced Illness Management (AIM) is a home-based program established to ease the transition between curative and comfort care for seriously ill patients who lack coordinated hospital, home health, and hospice care. OBJECTIVE: Measure the impact of the AIM program on the discharge disposition of participating home health patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: A total of 435 patients who received home health services through the Sutter Visiting Nurse Association and Hospice (SVNA&H) and who were discharged between 2003 and September 2005 were included in this study. Participants were selected based on a life expectancy of 6 months or less and additionally matched on prognosis of current episode of illness and symptom status. Intervention patients were compared to those receiving usual home health care at two SVNA&H branches. RESULTS: In the within-branch comparison, a 28% difference was observed in the number of hospice referrals between patients who received the AIM intervention and Usual Care I (47% AIM; 33% UCI, p = 0.003). When patients receiving the AIM intervention were compared to patients from another branch, Usual Care II, a 67% difference emerged (47% AIM; 16% UCII, p < 0.0001). Among African American patients, 60% and 73% more patients were referred to hospice when AIM patients were compared to Usual Care I and Usual Care II patients, respectively (p < 0.01). These differences persisted after controlling for symptom status, patient demographics and home health length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The AIM program was successful at increasing hospice utilization through a targeted intervention focused on palliative and end-of-life care, increased patient education and decision making, and a dynamic treatment approach. The finding of increased utilization by African Americans, a population traditionally reluctant to use hospice, was particularly noteworthy.
Authors: Amy S Kelley; Kenneth E Covinsky; Rebecca J Gorges; Karen McKendrick; Evan Bollens-Lund; R Sean Morrison; Christine S Ritchie Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Vincent Maida; Mario Corbo; Michael Dolzhykov; Marguerite Ennis; Shiraz Irani; Linda Trozzolo Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.315