Literature DB >> 1718722

Percutaneous magnetic coil stimulation of human cervical vertebral column: site of stimulation and clinical application.

S Chokroverty1, M A Picone, M Chokroverty.   

Abstract

In order to understand which neural elements are excited after percutaneous magnetic coil (MC) stimulation over the cervical vertebral column we have performed such study in 8 normal subjects and 4 patients. On moving the coil rostrocaudally up to 3 cm and horizontally up to 2 cm from the midline we found no change in the latencies of the compound muscle action potentials to biceps, deltoid, abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi muscles indicating a fixed site of excitation of the spinal roots within the intervertebral foramina. F latencies to APB after stimulation of the median nerve at the wrist were always longer than the direct latencies obtained after cervical vertebral stimulation. The mean difference between indirect latency based on F technique and direct latency to APB was 0.45 msec which represented a distance of 2.7 cm distal to the anterior horn cells assuming a conduction velocity of 60 m/sec. MC stimulation in 2 patients suggested a diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy which was confirmed by imaging studies or operative findings. Both MC and needle root stimulation in one patient with diabetic brachial plexopathy and in another with diabetic polyneuropathy suggested that the needle stimulation occurred about 1.2-1.8 cm proximal to MC stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1718722     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(91)90025-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  8 in total

Review 1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Detection of C8/T1 radiculopathy by measuring the root motor conduction time.

Authors:  Dougho Park; Sang-Eok Lee; Jae Man Cho; Joong Won Yang; Donghoon Yang; Mansu Kim; Heum Dai Kwon
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Motor evoked potentials following cervical electrical stimulation in brachial plexus lesions.

Authors:  G Abbruzzese; M Morena; C Caponnetto; C Trompetto; M Abbruzzese; E Favale
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Motor Evoked Potentials after Supraspinal Stimulation in Pre- and Postoperative Evaluations of Patients with Cervical Radiculopathy.

Authors:  Aleksandra Bryndal; Magdalena Wojtysiak; Jakub Moskal; Joanna Lipiec-Kowalska; Martyna Borowczyk; Magdalena Tańska; Agnieszka Grochulska; Juliusz Huber; Marian Majchrzycki
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Excitatory and inhibitory responses to cervical root magnetic stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  E Ruiu; J Valls-Sole
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2021-10-30

6.  Controversies and Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Transspinal Magnetic Stimulation: A Critical Review and Exploratory Trial in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.

Authors:  Rafael Bernhart Carra; Guilherme Diogo Silva; Isabela Bruzzi Bezerra Paraguay; Fabricio Diniz de Lima; Janaina Reis Menezes; Aruane Mello Pineda; Glaucia Aline Nunes; Juliana da Silva Simões; Marcondes Cavalcante França; Rubens Gisbert Cury
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-14       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Neurophysiological study to assess the severity of each site through the motor neuron fiber in entrapment neuropathy.

Authors:  Ryoichi Shibuya; Hideo Kawai; Kouji Yamamoto
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2009-06-17

8.  Cervicothoracic multisegmental transpinal evoked potentials in humans.

Authors:  Jonathan Einhorn; Alan Li; Royi Hazan; Maria Knikou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.