Literature DB >> 17186759

An information theoretic measure for the evaluation of ordinal scale data.

W J Tastle1, M J Wierman.   

Abstract

This article describes a new measure of dispersion as an indication of consensus and dissention. Building on the generally accepted Shannon entropy, this measure utilizes a probability distribution and the ordered ranking of categories in an ordinal scale distribution to yield a value confined to the unit interval. Unlike other measures that need to be normalized, this measure is always in the interval 0 to 1. The measure is typically applied to the Likert scale to determine degrees of agreement among ordinal-ranked categories when one is dealing with data collection and analysis, although other scales are possible. Using this measure, investigators can easily determine the proximity of ordinal data to consensus (agreement) or dissention. Consensus and dissention are defined relative to the degree of proximity of values constituting a frequency distribution on the ordinal scale measure. The authors identify a set of criteria that a measure must satisfy in order to be an acceptable indicator of consensus and show how the consensus measure satisfies all the criteria.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17186759     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  7 in total

1.  Culture-centeredness in community-based participatory research: contributions to health education intervention research.

Authors:  Nina Wallerstein; John G Oetzel; Bonnie Duran; Maya Magarati; Cynthia Pearson; Lorenda Belone; Joyce Davis; Lori DeWindt; Sarah Kastelic; Julie Lucero; Charmaine Ruddock; Erika Sutter; Mohan J Dutta
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2019-08-01

2.  Enhancing stewardship of community-engaged research through governance.

Authors:  John G Oetzel; Malia Villegas; Heather Zenone; Emily R White Hat; Nina Wallerstein; Bonnie Duran
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Policy relevant results from an expert elicitation on the health risks of phthalates.

Authors:  Karin Elisabeth Zimmer; Arno Christian Gutleb; Solveig Ravnum; Martin Krayer von Krauss; Albertinka J Murk; Erik Ropstad; Janneche Utne Skaare; Gunnar Sundstøl Eriksen; Jan Ludvig Lyche; Janna G Koppe; Brooke L Magnanti; Aileen Yang; Alena Bartonova; Hans Keune
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 5.984

4.  Impact of Participatory Health Research: A Test of the Community-Based Participatory Research Conceptual Model.

Authors:  John G Oetzel; Nina Wallerstein; Bonnie Duran; Shannon Sanchez-Youngman; Tung Nguyen; Kent Woo; Jun Wang; Amy Schulz; Joseph Keawe'aimoku Kaholokula; Barbara Israel; Margarita Alegria
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Role of wearable rhythm recordings in clinical decision making-The wEHRAbles project.

Authors:  Martin Manninger; Jedrzej Kosiuk; David Zweiker; Mario Njeim; Bor Antolic; Bratislav Kircanski; Jacob M Larsen; Emma Svennberg; Philippe Vanduynhoven; David Duncker
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 2.882

6.  Scientists have favorable opinions on immunity certificates but raise concerns regarding fairness and inequality.

Authors:  Iván Aranzales; Ho Fai Chan; Reiner Eichenberger; Rainer Hegselmann; David Stadelmann; Benno Torgler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Individual Differences in Responsiveness to Acupuncture: An Exploratory Survey of Practitioner Opinion.

Authors:  David F Mayor; Lara S McClure; J Helgi Clayton McClure
Journal:  Medicines (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.