Literature DB >> 17186422

Which women aren't getting mammograms and why? (United States).

Helen I Meissner1, Nancy Breen, Michele L Taubman, Sally W Vernon, Barry I Graubard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates why women who reported no recent mammogram did not get the test.
METHODS: Using data from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), we examine correlates of mammography use among women 40 years and older (n = 10,212), with particular focus on the 30% (n = 3,188) who reported no recent mammogram. Non-screening is examined in the context of two important correlates of mammography use-access to health care and a physician's recommendation to get a mammogram.
RESULTS: In total, 80% of non-screeners who reported having access to healthcare did not receive a recommendation for a mammogram. Women age 65 years and older were more likely than younger women to report not receiving a recommendation (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.25-2.50). For women who reported having access, non-screening was significantly more likely among younger women (40-49), those with less education, incomes less than 20,000 dollars, residence outside Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and no family history of breast cancer. Among women with access problems, those who had not visited a primary care provider in the past year were much more likely to be non-screeners (80%) compared with those who had seen a provider (46%). Among women with access, those who reported put it off as the main reason for non-screening were significantly more likely to be younger and to be born in the U.S. than women who said that they didn't know they needed a mammogram.
CONCLUSIONS: Most non-screeners report not receiving a physician recommendation for mammography. Although a minority reported access problems, the effect of lacking access on utilization was strong and is accentuated when women without access do not see a doctor. These findings confirm the importance of a mammography recommendation and raise questions concerning whether this information is being conveyed by physicians or heard by patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17186422     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-006-0078-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  53 in total

1.  Significance of increasing poverty levels for determining late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 1990 and 2000.

Authors:  Janis Barry; Nancy Breen; Michael Barrett
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  The role of early-life socioeconomic status in breast cancer incidence and mortality: unraveling life course mechanisms.

Authors:  Tetyana Pudrovska; Benedicta Anikputa
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2011-09-28

3.  Recommendation recall and satisfaction after attending breast/ovarian cancer risk counseling.

Authors:  Sharon L Bober; Lizbeth A Hoke; Rosemary B Duda; Nadine M Tung
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Intentions to maintain adherence to mammography.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; J Michael Bowling; Noel T Brewer; Isaac M Lipkus; Celette Sugg Skinner; Tara S Strigo; Barbara K Rimer
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  The "Welcome to Medicare" visit: a missed opportunity for cancer screening among women?

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Gail A Jensen; Andrea K Biddle
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Breast cancer surveillance practices among women previously treated with chest radiation for a childhood cancer.

Authors:  Kevin C Oeffinger; Jennifer S Ford; Chaya S Moskowitz; Lisa R Diller; Melissa M Hudson; Joanne F Chou; Stephanie M Smith; Ann C Mertens; Tara O Henderson; Debra L Friedman; Wendy M Leisenring; Leslie L Robison
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Behavioral theory in the context of applied cancer screening research.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Caroline Cranos
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2009-10

8.  Factors Affecting Hispanic Women's Participation in Screening for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Arelis Moore de Peralta; Bonnie Holaday; James R McDonell
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-06

9.  Access to mammography screening in a large urban population: a multi-level analysis.

Authors:  Stephen C Meersman; Nancy Breen; Linda W Pickle; Helen I Meissner; Paul Simon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Using small-area estimation to describe county-level disparities in mammography.

Authors:  Karen L Schneider; Kate L Lapane; Melissa A Clark; William Rakowski
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.