Literature DB >> 17186361

Provider's volume and quality of breast cancer detection and treatment.

Nicole Hébert-Croteau1, Danièle Roberge, Jacques Brisson.   

Abstract

For many health conditions, the process or result of medical procedures improves with increasing caseload. The evidence about breast cancer has not been thoroughly assessed. This review synthesizes the literature about provider's volume and performance in either breast cancer screening with mammography or treatment. Articles published in English between 1990 and 2006 were identified by a computerized search and by review of reference lists. In screening with mammography, the reading volume of the radiologist and the screening volume of the facility influence different components of performance. The most conclusive evidence for breast cancer treatment concerns the association between the surgeon's caseload and the process or end-results of therapeutic interventions. Although the mechanisms of these associations still need to be clarified, large provider's volume in screening mammography or breast cancer treatment is often related to the quality of medical interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17186361     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9439-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  4 in total

1.  Effect of radiologists' diagnostic work-up volume on interpretive performance.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; Robert A Smith; Patricia A Carney; Diana L Miglioretti; Barbara S Monsees; Edward A Sickles; Stephen H Taplin; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Tracy L Onega
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Melissa L Anderson; Sebastien J P A Haneuse; Edward A Sickles; Robert A Smith; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Robert D Rosenberg; Berta M Geller; Tracy L Onega; Barbara S Monsees; Lawrence W Bassett; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Are radiologists' goals for mammography accuracy consistent with published recommendations?

Authors:  Sara L Jackson; Andrea J Cook; Diana L Miglioretti; Patricia A Carney; Berta M Geller; Tracy Onega; Robert D Rosenberg; R James Brenner; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  Re-examining the significance of surgical volume to breast cancer survival and recurrence versus process quality of care in Taiwan.

Authors:  Raymond N Kuo; Kuo-Piao Chung; Mei-Shu Lai
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.402

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.