PURPOSE: To carry out a prospective investigation of the functional and morphological outcome of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IEM) surgery with or without the assistance of indocyanine green (ICG) in a randomised controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent vitrectomy with removal of IEM combined with cataract surgery were randomly allocated to two groups: 27 patients were operated on with ICG 0.1% in glucose 5%, 33 patients without ICG. Functional outcome was assessed 3-4 months postoperatively with improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Amsler grid test, and automated and kinetic perimetry. Postoperative residual or recurrent IEM was assessed with bio-microscopy, and macular oedema with optical coherence tomography (OCT). Improvement in BCVA was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: BCVA improved in 49 patients, remained unchanged in five and decreased in five. Improvement in BCVA and reduction of macular oedema were statistically significant within both groups (P < 0.01). Improvement in BCVA was not statistically significantly different whether ICG was used or not [0.17 (logarithm of minimum angle of resolution; logMAR) with ICG and 0.24 (logMAR) without ICG] (P = 0.59). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative or postoperative BCVA, reduction of macular oedema, postoperative Amsler grid test, or incidence of residual or recurrent IEM between the two groups. Visual field defects were detected in two patients operated on with ICG. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of IEM with or without the assistance of ICG equally improved visual function and macular morphology.
PURPOSE: To carry out a prospective investigation of the functional and morphological outcome of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IEM) surgery with or without the assistance of indocyanine green (ICG) in a randomised controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent vitrectomy with removal of IEM combined with cataract surgery were randomly allocated to two groups: 27 patients were operated on with ICG 0.1% in glucose 5%, 33 patients without ICG. Functional outcome was assessed 3-4 months postoperatively with improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Amsler grid test, and automated and kinetic perimetry. Postoperative residual or recurrent IEM was assessed with bio-microscopy, and macular oedema with optical coherence tomography (OCT). Improvement in BCVA was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: BCVA improved in 49 patients, remained unchanged in five and decreased in five. Improvement in BCVA and reduction of macular oedema were statistically significant within both groups (P < 0.01). Improvement in BCVA was not statistically significantly different whether ICG was used or not [0.17 (logarithm of minimum angle of resolution; logMAR) with ICG and 0.24 (logMAR) without ICG] (P = 0.59). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative or postoperative BCVA, reduction of macular oedema, postoperative Amsler grid test, or incidence of residual or recurrent IEM between the two groups. Visual field defects were detected in two patients operated on with ICG. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of IEM with or without the assistance of ICG equally improved visual function and macular morphology.
Authors: Peter Stalmans; Elisabeth H Van Aken; Marc Veckeneer; Eric J Feron; Ingeborg Stalmans Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Andrea P Da Mata; Christopher D Riemann; Márcio B Nehemy; Robert E Foster; Michael R Petersen; Scott E Burk Journal: Retina Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Christos Haritoglou; Arnd Gandorfer; Carolin A Gass; Markus Schaumberger; Michael W Ulbig; Anselm Kampik Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Timothy L Jackson; Jost Hillenkamp; Bruce C Knight; Jin-Jun Zhang; Dhanes Thomas; Miles R Stanford; John Marshall Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Fernando M Penha; Marianne Pons; Elaine de Paula Fiod Costa; Eduardo B Rodrigues; Mauricio Maia; Maria E Marin-Castaño; Michel Eid Farah Journal: Ophthalmologica Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Francesco Semeraro; Francesco Morescalchi; Sarah Duse; Elena Gambicorti; Andrea Russo; Ciro Costagliola Journal: J Ophthalmol Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 1.909
Authors: Fernando M Penha; Marianne Pons; Elaine Fiod Costa; Nilana Meza Tenório Barros; Eduardo B Rodrigues; Emmerson Badaró Cardoso; Eduardo Dib; Mauricio Maia; Maria E Marin-Castaño; Michel Eid Farah Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-10 Impact factor: 3.240