Literature DB >> 17185967

Who is implicated in the care of digestive cancers? A population-based study over a 25-year period.

Camille Vernet1, Côme Lepage, Catherine Lejeune, Jean Faivre, Anne-Marie Bouvier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to study health care delivery patterns during the initial phase of the management of digestive cancers in the Côte-d'Or area between 1976 and 2000 and to learn about the impact of patient- and disease-related features on trends in care patterns.
METHOD: Health care patterns were divided into 3 categories depending on whether care was delivered by public or private health care providers or a combination of the two. A polytomous logistic regression model was used to search for factors associated with the choice of health care delivery.
RESULTS: In the Côte-d'Or area, 12 055 new digestive cancer cases were diagnosed between January 1, 1976 and December 31, 2000, including 6 304 colorectal cancers. Public care structures managed 39% of patients, private care structures 42% and both (combined pattern) 19%. Women, young patients and patients with early-stage cancer were more often managed by private than by public facilities. Private health care institutions exclusively managed more colorectal cancers than public institutions (49.7% vs 34.2%) and fewer liver cancers (23.3% vs 62.8%) or pancreatic cancers (34.8% vs 47.5%). There was an increasing trend toward management by private instead of public institutions over the period. The proportion of exclusive private care rose from 35.0% (1976-1980) to 44.6% (1996-2000). Cancers diagnosed following symptoms concerned 85% of cases and were more often managed in private clinics. Cancers diagnosed in an emergency setting were more often managed in public institutions (48.3% vs 42.0%).
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the disparity of the characteristics of patients with digestive cancers depending on the type of institution delivering health care, with a trend toward an increasing role for private health care centres. The present findings suggest that data collected from a specific care pattern cannot be extrapolated to the general population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17185967     DOI: 10.1016/s0399-8320(06)73533-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin Biol        ISSN: 0399-8320


  3 in total

1.  Impact of the ABCDE triage on the number of patient visits to the emergency department.

Authors:  Jarmo Kantonen; Johanna Kaartinen; Juho Mattila; Ricardo Menezes; Mia Malmila; Maaret Castren; Timo Kauppila
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2010-06-03

2.  Impact of the ABCDE triage in primary care emergency department on the number of patient visits to different parts of the health care system in Espoo City.

Authors:  Jarmo Kantonen; Ricardo Menezes; Tuula Heinänen; Juho Mattila; Kari J Mattila; Timo Kauppila
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2012-01-04

3.  The effect on the patient flow in a local health care after implementing reverse triage in a primary care emergency department: a longitudinal follow-up study.

Authors:  Timo Kauppila; Katri Seppänen; Juho Mattila; Johanna Kaartinen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.581

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.