Literature DB >> 17185476

Lies and coercion: why psychiatrists should not participate in police and intelligence interrogations.

Jeffrey S Janofsky1.   

Abstract

Police interrogators routinely use deceptive techniques to obtain confessions from criminal suspects. The United States Executive Branch has attempted to justify coercive interrogation techniques in which physical or mental pain and suffering may be used during intelligence interrogations of persons labeled unlawful combatants. It may be appropriate for law enforcement, military, or intelligence personnel who are not physicians to use such techniques. However, forensic psychiatry ethical practice requires honesty, striving for objectivity, and respect for persons. Deceptive and coercive interrogation techniques violate these moral values. When a psychiatrist directly uses, works with others who use, or trains others to use deceptive or coercive techniques to obtain information in police, military, or intelligence interrogations, the psychiatrist breaches basic principles of ethics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17185476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Psychiatry Law        ISSN: 1093-6793


  2 in total

Review 1.  Mental health and the law: An overview and need to develop and strengthen the discipline of forensic psychiatry in India.

Authors:  Pratima Murthy; B C Malathesh; C Naveen Kumar; Suresh Bada Math
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.759

2.  "Enhanced" interrogation of detainees: do psychologists and psychiatrists participate?

Authors:  Abraham L Halpern; John H Halpern; Sean B Doherty
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 2.464

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.