BACKGROUND: Quitlines have been established as an effective, evidence-based, population-wide strategy to deliver smoking-cessation treatment, and are now available in most states across America. However, little is known about the organization, financing, promotion, and cost of state quitlines. METHODS: In 2004, the North American Quitline Consortium surveyed the 50 states and Washington DC to obtain information about state quitlines. Data were analyzed in fall 2005 through spring 2006. Analyses of these data are reported in this paper. RESULTS: Analyses were limited to the 38 states that reported having a quitline in 2004. State governments funded most (89.5%) quitlines. Median state quitline operating budgets in 2004 were 500,000 dollars; this translates into a modest annual median operating cost of 0.14 dollar per capita or 0.85 dollar per adult smoker. A lesser amount was spent for quitline promotion. Quitline services varied, with 97.4% of respondents providing mailed self-help resources, 89.5% providing proactive telephone counseling, and 89.2% providing referrals to other services. Many quitlines provide services in languages other than English. Only 21.1% of quitlines reported providing cessation medication at no cost. Promotional strategies varied widely. CONCLUSION: A large majority of U.S. smokers live in states with tobacco quitlines, which provide cessation treatment at a remarkably modest per capita cost. There is a great deal of congruence in services and promotional strategies among states. Further research is required to determine how external factors such as the federal National Network of Tobacco Cessation Quitlines funding for state quitlines and the availability of a national portal number (1-800-QUITNOW), both implemented in 2004, affect state quitlines. Additional research to evaluate the cost effectiveness of quitline services is also warranted.
BACKGROUND: Quitlines have been established as an effective, evidence-based, population-wide strategy to deliver smoking-cessation treatment, and are now available in most states across America. However, little is known about the organization, financing, promotion, and cost of state quitlines. METHODS: In 2004, the North American Quitline Consortium surveyed the 50 states and Washington DC to obtain information about state quitlines. Data were analyzed in fall 2005 through spring 2006. Analyses of these data are reported in this paper. RESULTS: Analyses were limited to the 38 states that reported having a quitline in 2004. State governments funded most (89.5%) quitlines. Median state quitline operating budgets in 2004 were 500,000 dollars; this translates into a modest annual median operating cost of 0.14 dollar per capita or 0.85 dollar per adult smoker. A lesser amount was spent for quitline promotion. Quitline services varied, with 97.4% of respondents providing mailed self-help resources, 89.5% providing proactive telephone counseling, and 89.2% providing referrals to other services. Many quitlines provide services in languages other than English. Only 21.1% of quitlines reported providing cessation medication at no cost. Promotional strategies varied widely. CONCLUSION: A large majority of U.S. smokers live in states with tobacco quitlines, which provide cessation treatment at a remarkably modest per capita cost. There is a great deal of congruence in services and promotional strategies among states. Further research is required to determine how external factors such as the federal National Network of Tobacco Cessation Quitlines funding for state quitlines and the availability of a national portal number (1-800-QUITNOW), both implemented in 2004, affect state quitlines. Additional research to evaluate the cost effectiveness of quitline services is also warranted.
Authors: Shu-Hong Zhu; Shiushing Wong; Colleen Stevens; David Nakashima; Anthony Gamst Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Paula A Keller; Annamaria Feltracco; Linda A Bailey; Zhanhai Li; Jeff Niederdeppe; Timothy B Baker; Michael C Fiore Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Ana Patricia Ortiz; Elba C Díaz-Toro; William A Calo; Virmarie Correa-Fernández; Antonio Cases; María C Santos-Ortiz; Carlos Mazas; Luz Mejía; David W Wetter Journal: P R Health Sci J Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 0.705
Authors: Barbara A Schillo; Andrea Mowery; Lija O Greenseid; Michael G Luxenberg; Andrew Zieffler; Matthew Christenson; Raymond G Boyle Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Prince Atorkey; Christine Paul; Billie Bonevski; John Wiggers; Aimee Mitchell; Emma Byrnes; Christophe Lecathelinais; Flora Tzelepis Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-01-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Paula A Keller; Eric J Beyer; Timothy B Baker; Linda A Bailey; Michael C Fiore Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 3.390