Literature DB >> 17184916

Analysis of the main factors affecting the evaluation of the radon dose in workplaces: the case of tourist caves.

Carlos Sainz1, Luis Santiago Quindós, Ismael Fuente, Jorge Nicolás, Luis Quindós.   

Abstract

High concentrations of radon exist in several workplaces like tourist caves mainly because of the low ventilation rates existing at these enclosures. In this sense, in its 1990 publication, the ICRP recommended that high exposures of radon in workplaces should be considered as occupational exposure. In developed caves in which guides provide tours for the general public great care is needed for taking remedial actions concerning radon, because in some circumstances forced ventilation may alter the humidity inside the cave affecting some of the formations or paintings that attract tourists. Tourist guides can work about 1900 h per year, so the only option to protect them and other cave workers from radon exposure is to apply an appropriate system of radiation protection mainly based on limitation of exposure by restricting the amount of time spent in the cave. Because of the typical environmental conditions inside the caves, the application of these protecting actions requires to know some indoor air characteristics like particle concentration, as well as radon progeny behaviour in order to get more realistic effective dose values In this work the results of the first two set of radon measurements program carried out in 10 caves located in the region of Cantabria (Spain) are presented.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17184916     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  4 in total

1.  Measurements of aerosol particles in the Škocjan Caves, Slovenia.

Authors:  Irena Grgić; Ivan Iskra; Boštjan Podkrajšek; Vanja Debevec Gerjevič
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Radon levels in Romanian caves: an occupational exposure survey.

Authors:  Alexandra Cucoş Dinu; Monica I Călugăr; Bety D Burghele; Oana A Dumitru; Constantin Cosma; Bogdan P Onac
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 3.  RADON IN US WORKPLACES: A REVIEW.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 0.972

4.  Nanoaerosols including radon decay products in outdoor and indoor air at a suburban site.

Authors:  Mateja Smerajec; Janja Vaupotič
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.